Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Apr;186(4):561-70.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1259-7. Epub 2008 Jan 9.

Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials

Affiliations

Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials

Rajiv Ranganathan et al. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to examine the influence of visual feedback on compensatory variations in force within and between trials. In Experiment 1, the task was to maintain a constant force of 5 N for 15 s using both index fingers. In Experiment 2, the task was to produce discrete force pulses such that the peak value of the sum of the two finger forces was 5 N. In both experiments, there were three conditions that manipulated the amount of visual feedback of the force trace. Results showed that the within-trial correlations between the finger forces increased when feedback was degraded, indicating that the two fingers were increasingly constrained toward acting as a single unit. Similarly, between-trial correlations showed that the amount of error compensation decreased when feedback was removed, indicating that participants produced a smaller set of goal equivalent solutions. It appears that feedback has a dual role in coordination-removing the constraints on the degrees of freedom within trials, and facilitating the utilization of redundancy between trials. The distinction between these two classes of variation is central to understanding the redundancy problem in motor control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Biol Cybern. 2006 Sep;95(3):271-80 - PubMed
    1. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Nov;5(11):1226-35 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(3):275-85 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):69-73 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 2005 May;163(2):137-58 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources