Willingness to pay for mass screening for prostate cancer: a contingent valuation survey
- PMID: 18184186
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01931.x
Willingness to pay for mass screening for prostate cancer: a contingent valuation survey
Abstract
We recently reported on the willingness to pay (WTP) for prostate cancer screening with prostate specific antigen (PSA) using the contingent valuation method (CVM). This study, a continuation of the work outlined in the previous report, comprises a more precise and detailed survey. In an Internet questionnaire survey, 400 men aged 50-59 in Japan were randomly split into two groups: the ill-informed group (n = 207), which was provided with information about the detection rate, and the well-informed group (n = 193), which was given additional information about false positive/negative results, latent cancer, and the yet-to-be-demonstrated mortality-reducing effect of the test. The mean WTP was yen1670 ($15.2). Giving sufficient information would not decrease WTP for PSA screening. Men place a high value on 'peace of mind' through the ascertaining of no sign of cancer at the present rather than on the future-oriented life-saving effects that may be gained through such screening.
Similar articles
-
Benefit evaluation of mass screening for prostate cancer: willingness-to-pay measurement using contingent valuation.Urology. 2006 Nov;68(5):1046-50. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.009. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17113896 Clinical Trial.
-
Difference in willingness-to-pay for prostate cancer screening between ill-informed and well-informed men: a contingent valuation survey.Urology. 2011 Jun;77(6):1325-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.02.025. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Urology. 2011. PMID: 21507471
-
Women's anxieties caused by false positives in mammography screening: a contingent valuation survey.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Jan;101(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9270-4. Epub 2006 Jul 4. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007. PMID: 16821083
-
Prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer: evidence, controversies and future perspectives.Int J Urol. 2009 May;16(5):458-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2009.02293.x. Epub 2009 Apr 1. Int J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19341365 Review.
-
Screening for prostate cancer in U.S. men ACPM position statement on preventive practice.Am J Prev Med. 2008 Feb;34(2):164-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.003. Am J Prev Med. 2008. PMID: 18201648 Review.
Cited by
-
Willingness to pay for an mRNA-based anti-cancer treatment: results from a contingent valuation study in Israel.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Feb 19;13(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00594-z. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024. PMID: 38374060 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of willingness to pay for health services: a systematic review of contingent valuation studies.Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Dec;23(9):1455-1482. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01437-x. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Eur J Health Econ. 2022. PMID: 35166973 Free PMC article.
-
Men's willingness to pay for prostate cancer screening: a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 9;9(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01522-3. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33298175 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method.Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2252-65. doi: 10.1111/hex.12195. Epub 2014 Aug 18. Health Expect. 2015. PMID: 25135005 Free PMC article.
-
Factor associated with willingness to pay for prevention of cancer: a study of prostate cancer screening.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Nov 21;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00494-0. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023. PMID: 37990328 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous