Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Apr;23(4):431-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0429-1.

Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: Experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Retrieval of colorectal polyps following snare polypectomy: Experience of the multiple-suction technique in 602 cases

Feng Ye et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Retrieving colorectal polyp after endoscopic snare polypectomy is time consuming and possibly incurs a failure. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of the multiple-suction (M-S) technique for retrieving a variety of polyps.

Materials and methods: Four hundred and nine cases received endoscopic snare polypectomy from January 2003 to January 2007 were reviewed. The resected polyps were retrieved by M-S technique, in which suction regarded as the leading technique, was taken in combination with channel occlusion, trap, snare, and grasping forcep. Time of cecal intubation and of polypectomy, total examination time, shape, size, location, and number of polyp(s) were recorded. Retrieval time and polyp lost rate were also noted.

Results: A total of 602 polyps more than 3 mm in diameter underwent snare polypectomy. There were 96.7% (582/602) of polyps retrieved by the M-S technique. The mean retrieval time was 1.5 +/- 0.6 min. Time of polypectomy, retrieval time, and total examination time were significantly positive correlative with the number of polyps (P < 0.05). In a univariate analysis, longer retrieval time was significantly associated with larger polyps, more distant polyps from the anus, and a greater number of polyps, while higher polyp lost rate was significantly associated with sessile polyp, smaller polyps, and a greater number of polyps. In a multivariate analysis, retrieval time level (< or = 2.0 or >2.0 min) was linked to the number of polyps.

Conclusions: The M-S technique is proved to be reliable when used in the majority cases of colorectal polyp retrieval. In retrieving too many polyps, the M-S technique is time consuming, and hence, additional methods should be applied to improve its retrieval effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1988 Nov;3(4):229-31 - PubMed
    1. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997 Mar-Apr;47(2):93-112 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Apr;42(4):543 - PubMed
    1. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006 May;21(4):301-7 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 2005 Mar;37(3):208-12 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources