Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary obstruction
- PMID: 18186687
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0082
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary obstruction
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the management of secondary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction by laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Materials and methods: Thirteen patients with symptomatic secondary UPJ obstruction undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty were included. Eight patients had obstruction on the right side and five patients on the left. The causes of obstruction were: failed Acucise retrograde endopyelotomy in seven patients, open pyelolithotomy in three, open pyeloplasty in one, retrograde endopyelotomy with laser in one, and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in one. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty was performed in all patients. A Double J stent was introduced antegrade and intraoperatively and removed 6 weeks later in all patients.
Results: Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyeloplasty was successful in 12 patients (92.3%). Operative time ranged from 135 to 270 minutes, with a mean of 195 minutes. The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (range 2 to 5 days). Follow-up ranged from 16 to 36 months with a mean of 22.4 months. Blood loss was insignificant in all surgeries, and no conversion or intraoperative complications occurred.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary UPJ obstruction in our series was performed without conversion to open surgery. The initial results were similar to those of primary laparoscopy in our series or those of open pyeloplasty reported in the literature. These results led us to consider the laparoscopic correction as a good alternative in such cases.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12771713
-
Laparoscopic In Situ Dismembered Pyeloplasty Can Facilitate Laparoscopic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair: A Prospective Cohort Trial.J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):218-222. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0538. Epub 2017 Dec 12. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29084479
-
Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience.J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1467-71. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9876. J Endourol. 2007. PMID: 18186685
-
[Laparoscopic pyeloplasty].Ann Urol (Paris). 2006 Dec;40(6):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anuro.2006.10.001. Ann Urol (Paris). 2006. PMID: 17214235 Review. French.
-
Endopyelotomy review.Arch Esp Urol. 1999 Jun;52(5):541-8. Arch Esp Urol. 1999. PMID: 10427896 Review.
Cited by
-
Redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a single center experience and a review of the literature.BMC Urol. 2025 Mar 27;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01746-2. BMC Urol. 2025. PMID: 40148920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Robotic laparoscopic pyeloplasty.JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):110-5. doi: 10.4293/108680813X1369342251983. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 24680152 Free PMC article.
-
Salvage minimally invasive robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: a systematic review.Arab J Urol. 2022 Jun 28;20(4):204-211. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2082208. eCollection 2022. Arab J Urol. 2022. PMID: 36353474 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty.World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):951-956. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1951-y. Epub 2016 Oct 8. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 27722874
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical