Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Mar;40(2):148-55.
doi: 10.3164/jcbn.40.148.

Comparison of Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Complications by Rebamipide and Misoprostol: A Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial-STORM STUDY

Affiliations

Comparison of Prevention of NSAID-Induced Gastrointestinal Complications by Rebamipide and Misoprostol: A Randomized, Multicenter, Controlled Trial-STORM STUDY

Soo-Heon Park et al. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2007 Mar.

Abstract

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have gastrointestinal side effects such as dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, hemorrhage, and perforation. Misoprostol and PPIs have been used to prevent NSAID-induced gastroduodenal injury. Rebamipide increases gastric mucus and stimulates the production of endogenous prostaglandins. The prophylactic effect of rebamipide on NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications in rebamipide- and misoprostol-treated groups. Patients were randomized to two groups and took a conventional NSAID plus rebamipide or misoprostol for 12 weeks. Gastric mucosal damage was evaluated by endoscopy at screening and the end of the study. The prevalences of active gastric ulcer were 7/176 (3.9%) in the rebamipide group and 3/156 (1.9%) in the misoprostol group. The prevalences of peptic ulcer were 8/176 (4.5%) in the rebamipide group and 7/156 (4.4%) in the misoprostol group. The cumulative incidences of peptic ulcer in the high-risk subgroup were 6/151 (4.0%) for rebamipide and 6/154 (3.9%) for misoprostol. In conclusion, rebamipide prevented NSAID-induced peptic ulcer as effectively as misoprostol in patients on long-term NSAID therapy. Rebamipide may be a useful therapeutic option for the prevention of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal ulcer because of its therapeutic effect and safety.

Keywords: NSAID; clinical trial; gastrointestinal tract; misoprostol; rebamipide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of subjects progress through the study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Enrollment and randomization of the studied population Symptoms; Two patients had intractable pain, and 2 were vomiting in the rebamipide group. One had stomach pain, 4 had abdominal distension, 2 had lower abdominal pain, and 5 had intractable diarrhea in the misoprostol group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Maetzel A., Ferraz M.B., Bombardier C. The cost-effectiveness of misoprostol in preventing serious gastrointestinal events associated with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:16–25. - PubMed
    1. Raskin J.B., White R.H., Jackson J.E., Weaver A.L., Tindall E.A., Lies R.B., Stanton D.S. Misoprostol dosage in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastric and duodenal ulcers: a comparison of three regimens. Ann. Intern. Med. 1995;123:344–350. - PubMed
    1. Silverstein F.E., Graham D.Y., Senior J.R., Davies H.W., Struthers B.J., Bittman R.M., Geis G.S. Misoprostol reduces serious gastrointestinal complications in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Ann. Intern. Med. 1995;123:241–249. - PubMed
    1. Elliott S.L., Yeomans N.D., Buchanan R.R.C., Smallwood R.A. Efficacy of 12 months’ misoprostol as prophylaxis against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Scand. J. Rheumatol. 1994;23:171–176. - PubMed
    1. Yamasaki K., Ishiyama H., Imaizumi T., Kanbe T., Yabuchi Y. Effect of OPC-12759, a novel antiulcer agent, on chronic and acute experimental gastric ulcer, and gastric secretion in rats. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1989;49:441–448. - PubMed