Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan;10(1):87-96.
doi: 10.1080/14622200701704962.

Clinical trials and tribulations: lessons learned from recruiting pregnant ex-smokers for relapse prevention

Affiliations

Clinical trials and tribulations: lessons learned from recruiting pregnant ex-smokers for relapse prevention

Elena N Lopez et al. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Jan.

Abstract

The development of smoking cessation and relapse prevention interventions for pregnant and postpartum women is a public health priority. However, researchers have consistently reported substantial difficulty in recruiting this population into clinical trials. The problem is particularly acute for relapse prevention studies, which must recruit women who have already quit smoking because of their pregnancy. Although these individuals are an important target for tobacco control efforts, they represent an extremely small subgroup of the general population. This paper describes multiple recruitment strategies used for a clinical trial of a self-help relapse prevention program for pregnant women. The effectiveness of the strategies and the direct expense per participant recruited are provided. A proactive recruitment strategy (telephoning women whose phone numbers were purchased from a marketing firm) was ultimately much more successful than a variety of reactive strategies (advertisements, press releases, direct mail, Web placement, health care provider outreach). We found few differences between proactively and reactively recruited participants on baseline variables. The primary difference was that the former had smoked fewer cigarettes per day and reported lower nicotine dependence prior to quitting. Strengths and limitations of the recruitment strategies are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bowen DJ, Alfano CM, McGregor BA, Andersen MR. The relationship between perceived risk, affect, and health behaviors. Cancer Detection and Prevention. 2004;28:409–417. - PubMed
    1. Brandon TH, Collins BN, Juliano LM, Lazev AB. Preventing relapse among former smokers: A comparison of minimal interventions through telephone and mail. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2000;68(1):103–113. - PubMed
    1. Brandon TH, Meade CD, Herzog TA, Chirikos TN, Webb MS, Cantor AB. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a minimal intervention to prevent smoking relapse: Dismantling the effects of amount of content versus contact. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72(5):797–808. - PubMed
    1. Britton GA. A review of women and tobacco: Have we come such a long way? Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing. 1998;27:241–249. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control Medical-care expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 1995;46:1048–1050. - PubMed

Publication types