The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections
- PMID: 18189095
- PMCID: PMC2078571
- DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2007.633-644
The effects of reinforcer pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections
Abstract
The effects of reinforcement pairing and fading on preschoolers' snack selections were evaluated in a multiple baseline design. Baseline preferences for snack options were assessed via repeated paired-item preference assessments. Edible, social, and activity-based reinforcers were then exclusively paired with a less preferred snack option. Once the snack paired with reinforcement was selected most frequently, the three types of reinforcement were systematically faded. Frequent selections of the previously less preferred snack option were produced with paired reinforcement, but were disrupted for all children as the paired reinforcement was reduced to low levels. These data showed that paired reinforcement was initially effective in increasing preference for the originally less preferred snack options, but more permanent changes in the value of the snack options were not achieved. Conditions for producing persistent changes in children's snack choices are discussed.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Pairing vegetables with a liked food and visually appealing presentation: promising strategies for increasing vegetable consumption among preschoolers.Child Obes. 2014 Feb;10(1):72-6. doi: 10.1089/chi.2013.0115. Epub 2014 Jan 16. Child Obes. 2014. PMID: 24433126 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of a Short-Term Nutrition Education Child Care Pilot Intervention on Preschool Children's Intention To Choose Healthy Snacks and Actual Snack Choices.Child Obes. 2015 Oct;11(5):513-20. doi: 10.1089/chi.2015.0028. Epub 2015 Aug 17. Child Obes. 2015. PMID: 26280736
-
An evaluation of resistance to change with unconditioned and conditioned reinforcers.J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Sep;48(3):643-62. doi: 10.1002/jaba.226. Epub 2015 Jun 29. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015. PMID: 26119287
-
Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.J Appl Behav Anal. 2007 Spring;40(1):25-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.151-05. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007. PMID: 17471792 Free PMC article.
-
Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: the role of conditioned reinforcement.J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):533-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-533. J Appl Behav Anal. 2000. PMID: 11214029 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Healthy Eating: Approaching the Selection, Preparation, and Consumption of Healthy Food as Choice Behavior.Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jan 24;42(3):647-674. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00190-y. eCollection 2019 Sep. Perspect Behav Sci. 2019. PMID: 31976453 Free PMC article.
-
Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50. doi: 10.1037/a0029312. Epub 2012 Jul 30. Psychol Methods. 2012. PMID: 22845874 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bayens F, Eelen P, Van den Bergh O, Crombez G. Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learning and Motivation. 1990;21:434–455.
-
- Birch L.L. Effects of peer models' food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers' food preferences. Child Development. 1980;51:489–496.
-
- Birch L.L, Zimmerman S.I, Hind H. The influence of social-affective context on the formation of children's food preferences. Child Development. 1980;51:856–861.
-
- Capaldi E.D. Conditioned food preferences. In: Capaldi E.D, editor. Why we eat what we eat: The psychology of eating. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996. pp. 53–80.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources