Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Dec;90(6):2190-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of IVF-ICSI patients: a randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase of IVF-ICSI patients: a randomized, controlled trial

José Serna et al. Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of transdermal E(2) administration in the luteal phase of IVF/ICSI cycles.

Design: Prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial.

Setting: University-affiliated assisted reproduction center.

Patients: 1) Pilot trial to test serum E(2) behaviour during the luteal phase in women undergoing agonist as well as antagonist protocol; 2) women undergoing IVF/ICSI with good-quality embryos available.

Intervention(s): One hundred seventy-six patients were randomized by random number list on the day of embryo transfer to either: 1) progesterone (P) only as luteal support (200 mg bid starting the following night after oocyte retrieval); or 2) E(2) and P combined, applying E(2) patches (100 microg/day) twice per week beginning on the day of embryo transfer with P, as in the P-only group.

Main outcome measure(s): The primary outcome was implantation rate per embryo transfer; secondary outcome variables were pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, early pregnancy loss, multiple pregnancy rate, and midluteal P and E(2) levels.

Result(s): Hormonal levels did not differ between groups. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of implantation rate (34.9% [51 of 146] vs. 28.9% [41 of 142]), ongoing pregnancy rate 42% ([34 of 81] vs. 41.8% [33 of 79]), early pregnancy loss (15% [6 of 40] vs. 13.2% [5 of 38]), or multiple pregnancy rate (28.6% [12 of 42] vs. 24.4% [10/41]) in patients receiving P versus E(2) + P.

Conclusion(s): The addition of transdermal E(2) to the luteal-phase P support of IVF cycles did not improve cycle outcomes in terms of implantation and pregnancy rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms