Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;18(5):1058-64.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0843-3. Epub 2008 Jan 12.

Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer

Affiliations

Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer

Patrick Z McVeigh et al. Eur Radiol. 2008 May.

Abstract

The purpose was to investigate the potential value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurement with MRI in the assessment of cervix cancer. Diffusion-weighted MRI was performed in 47 patients with cervical carcinoma undergoing chemoradiation therapy and 26 normal controls on a 1.5-T system with a b-value of 600 s/mm(2). FIGO stage, tumor volume, nodal status, interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and oxygen measurements were recorded. Response was defined as no visible tumor 3-6 months following completion of therapy. The average median ADC (mADC) of cervical carcinomas (1.09+/-0.20 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) was significantly lower than normal cervix (2.09+/-0.46 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P<0.001). There was no correlation between mADC, nodal status, tumor volume, IFP or oxygen measurements. mADC was significantly lower in FIGO stages T1b/T2a (0.986 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) compared to T2b (1.21 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) and T3/T4 (1.10 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P<0.001). In patients with squamous carcinomas the 90th percentile of ADC values was lower in responders than non-responders (P<0.05). Median ADC in cervix carcinoma is significantly lower compared to normal cervix. ADC may have predictive value in squamous tumors, but further long-term study will determine the ultimate clinical utility.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(5):828-33 - PubMed
    1. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Jan;9(1):53-60 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):497-505 - PubMed
    1. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Apr;188(4):1001-8 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 2001 Sep 1;61(17):6400-5 - PubMed

Publication types