Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region
- PMID: 18193973
- DOI: 10.2319/121706-515.1
Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region
Abstract
Objective: To determine the success rate and the factors related to the success rate of orthodontic miniscrew implants (OMI) placed at the attached gingiva of the posterior buccal region.
Materials and methods: Four hundred eighty OMI placed in 209 orthodontic patients were examined retroactively. The sample was divided into young patients (range 10-18 years, N = 108) and adult patients (range 19-64 years, N = 109). The placement site was divided into three interdental areas from the first premolar to the second molar in the maxilla and mandible. According to soft tissue management, the samples were divided into incision and nonincision groups. Chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression analyses were used.
Results: The overall success rate was 83.8%. Dislodgement of the OMI occurred most frequently in the first 1-2 months, and more than 90% of the failures occurred within the first 4 months. Sex, age, jaw, soft tissue management, and placement side did not show any difference in the success rate. Placement site, however, showed a significant difference in the mandible of adult patients. There was no difference in the success rate in the maxilla.
Conclusions: Placement site is one of the important factors for success rate of OMI.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews.Eur J Orthod. 2011 Aug;33(4):388-95. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq090. Epub 2010 Oct 6. Eur J Orthod. 2011. PMID: 20926556
-
Success rate and risk factors associated with mini-implants reinstalled in the maxilla.Angle Orthod. 2008 Sep;78(5):895-901. doi: 10.2319/091207-430.1. Angle Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18298220
-
Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.Aust Orthod J. 2012 Nov;28(2):204-12. Aust Orthod J. 2012. PMID: 23304969
-
Miniscrews or palatal implants for skeletal anchorage in the maxilla: comparative aspects for decision making.World J Orthod. 2008 Spring;9(1):63-73. World J Orthod. 2008. PMID: 18426107 Review.
-
Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis.J Dent Res. 2011 Aug;90(8):969-76. doi: 10.1177/0022034511409236. Epub 2011 May 18. J Dent Res. 2011. PMID: 21593250 Review.
Cited by
-
The effect of multiple processing and re-use on orthodontic mini-screw torque values.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 May-Jun;12(3):243-7. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015. PMID: 26005464 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of biological and structural factors implicated in the clinical success of orthodontic miniscrews at posterior maxillary interradicular sites.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Apr;26(4):3523-3532. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04321-9. Epub 2021 Nov 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 34837567
-
Effect of healing time on bone-implant contact of orthodontic micro-implants: a histologic study.ISRN Dent. 2014 Apr 6;2014:179037. doi: 10.1155/2014/179037. eCollection 2014. ISRN Dent. 2014. PMID: 25006463 Free PMC article.
-
Temporary Anchorage Device: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2025 Apr 2;17(4):e81617. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81617. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40322412 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: A finite element analysis.Angle Orthod. 2016 Mar;86(2):221-6. doi: 10.2319/031115-153.1. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Angle Orthod. 2016. PMID: 26098865 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources