Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Jan 14:8:12.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-12.

Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial

Sandra H van Oostrom et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Considering the high costs of sick leave and the consequences of sick leave for employees, an early return-to-work of employees with mental disorders is very important. Therefore, a workplace intervention is developed based on a successful return-to-work intervention for employees with low back pain. The objective of this paper is to present the design of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the cost-effectiveness of the workplace intervention compared with usual care for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders.

Methods: The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a follow-up of one year. Employees eligible for this study are on sick leave for 2 to 8 weeks with common mental disorders. The workplace intervention will be compared with usual care. The workplace intervention is a stepwise approach that aims to reach consensus about a return-to-work plan by active participation and strong commitment of both the sick-listed employee and the supervisor. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome of this study is lasting return-to-work, which will be acquired from continuous registration systems of the companies after the follow-up. Secondary outcomes are total number of days of sick leave during the follow-up, severity of common mental disorders, coping style, job content, and attitude, social influence, and self-efficacy determinants. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated from the societal perspective. A process evaluation will also be conducted.

Discussion: Return-to-work is difficult to discuss in the workplace for sick-listed employees with mental disorders and their supervisors. Therefore, this intervention offers a unique opportunity for the sick-listed employee and the supervisor to discuss barriers for return-to-work. Results of this study will possibly contribute to improvement of disability management for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders. Results will become available in 2009.

Trial registration: ISRCTN92307123.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Content of the workplace intervention. The steps of the workplace intervention and the stakeholders involved.

References

    1. NKAP (Dutch Knowledge Centre of Work and Mind Factsheet 2, facts and figures about work-related psychological disorders [In Dutch: Factsheet 2, feiten en cijfers over arbeidsrelevante psychische aandoeningen] Utrecht. 2004.
    1. Department of Health . Choosing health: making healthier choices easier (Public Health White Paper) London: DH; 2004.
    1. The Dutch Institute of Psychologists (NIP) and the Dutch Association of Primary Care Psychologists (LVE) Work and mental health problems Explanation about guidelines for psychologists. Amsterdam: NIP/LVE; 2005.
    1. Henderson M, Glozier N, Holland EK. Long term sickness absence is caused by common conditions and needs managing. BMJ. 2005;330:802–803. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.802. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hensing G, Brage S, Nygard JF, Sandanger I, Tellnes G. Sickness absence with psychiatric disorders – an increased risk for marginalisation among men? Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000;35:335–340. doi: 10.1007/s001270050247. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data