Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;16(5):525-30.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0393-x. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

Post-radiation dental index: development and reliability

Affiliations

Post-radiation dental index: development and reliability

Mary P Walker et al. Support Care Cancer. 2008 May.

Abstract

Goals of the work: The aim of this paper was to develop, validate, and assess the reliability of a clinical index for assessing post-radiation dentition breakdown.

Materials and methods: An expert panel of four dentists with expertise in post-radiation patient care, oral radiology, and mineralized tissues reviewed a series of clinical photographs (n = 60) depicting a wide range of post-radiation lesions varying in size, severity, and location. Based on panel input related to lesion severity rankings and cut-points along a continuum of destruction, a semiquantitative, ordinal lesion scale was developed. A companion scale was developed to account for existing restorations. The index was then reviewed by a separate panel of dental clinician/researchers for confirmation of face and content validity and was refined based on their input. Following index approval by the expert and confirmatory panels, the index was evaluated for test-retest reliability by two educator/clinicians. After a brief calibration session, examiners reviewed and independently scored a second series of lesion images (n = 60). One week later, the same examiners independently scored the same images displayed in a different order. Inter- and intra-rater reliability and agreement were assessed (Spearman r and Kappa statistic).

Main results: Respective to sessions 1 and 2, inter-rater reliability values were r = 0.97 and r = 0.98, with Kappa values of kappa = 0.93 and kappa = 0.95. Respective intra-rater reliability and agreement values were 0.99 and 0.98 (rater 1), and 0.98 and 0.95 (rater 2).

Conclusions: A new index was developed and subsequently demonstrated face validity and excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability for potentially evaluating the severity of post-radiation dentition breakdown.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Post-radiation dental index clinical research form.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative post-radiation surface lesions scored 1–5.

References

    1. American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer? 2007. Available at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI 2 4 1X What are the key statistics for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer 60.asp?rnav=cri.
    1. American Cancer Society. Oral Cancer. 2007. Available at www.cancer.org/downloads/PRO/OralCancer.pdf.
    1. Anne PR, Curran WJ., Jr A phase II trial of subcutaneous amifostine and radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2002;12:18–19. - PubMed
    1. Anneroth G, Holm LE, Karlsson G. The effect of radiation on teeth. A clinical, histologic and microradiographic study. Int J Oral Surg. 1985;14:269–274. - PubMed
    1. Beumer J, Curtis TA, Nishimura R. Prosthodontic Procedures: Complete Dentures. In: Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT, editors. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc; St. Louis: 1996. pp. 101–102.

Publication types