Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb;10(1 Pt 2):194-214.
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00563.x.

Pediatric bipolar disorder: validity, phenomenology, and recommendations for diagnosis

Affiliations
Review

Pediatric bipolar disorder: validity, phenomenology, and recommendations for diagnosis

Eric A Youngstrom et al. Bipolar Disord. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To find, review, and critically evaluate evidence pertaining to the phenomenology of pediatric bipolar disorder and its validity as a diagnosis.

Methods: The present qualitative review summarizes and synthesizes available evidence about the phenomenology of bipolar disorder (BD) in youths, including description of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of symptoms, clarification about rates of cycling and mixed states, and discussion about chronic versus episodic presentations of mood dysregulation. The validity of the diagnosis of BD in youths is also evaluated based on traditional criteria including associated demographic characteristics, family environmental features, genetic bases, longitudinal studies of youths at risk of developing BD as well as youths already manifesting symptoms on the bipolar spectrum, treatment studies and pharmacologic dissection, neurobiological findings (including morphological and functional data), and other related laboratory findings. Additional sections review impairment and quality of life, personality and temperamental correlates, the clinical utility of a bipolar diagnosis in youths, and the dimensional versus categorical distinction as it applies to mood disorder in youths.

Results: A schema for diagnosis of BD in youths is developed, including a review of different operational definitions of 'bipolar not otherwise specified.' Principal areas of disagreement appear to include the relative role of elated versus irritable mood in assessment, and also the limits of the extent of the bipolar spectrum--when do definitions become so broad that they are no longer describing 'bipolar' cases?

Conclusions: In spite of these areas of disagreement, considerable evidence has amassed supporting the validity of the bipolar diagnosis in children and adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lofthouse N, Fristad M. Psychosocial interventions for children with early-onset bipolar spectrum disorder. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2004;21:71–89. - PubMed
    1. Hellander M. Lithium Testing in Children: A Public Health Necessity. Testimony to the Food and Drug Administration; Washington, DC: 2002.
    1. Naylor MW, Anderson TR, Kruesi MJ, Stoewe M. Pharmacoepidemiology of Bipolar Disorder in Abused and Neglected State Wards. Poster presented at the National Meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry; San Francisco, CA, USA. October 22–27, 2002.
    1. Youngstrom EA, Youngstrom JK, Starr M. Bipolar diagnoses in community mental health: Achenbach CBCL profiles and patterns of comorbidity. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58:569–575. - PubMed
    1. Geller B, Luby J. Child and adolescent bipolar disorder: a review of the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:1168–1176. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms