Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007;3(6):1039-44.

Higher persistence with valsartan compared with enalapril in daily practice

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Higher persistence with valsartan compared with enalapril in daily practice

Satu J Siiskonen et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: To compare persistence with valsartan and enalapril in daily practice.

Methods: The PHARMO Record Linkage System includes various data registries including drug dispensing and hospitalizations for > or =2 million subjects in the Netherlands. Patients newly treated with valsartan or enalapril in the period of 1999-2002 were selected. Persistence was calculated by summing up the number of days of continuous treatment. Patients who remained on therapy with valsartan or enalapril for 12 or 24 months were defined as persistent at 1 or 2 years, respectively.

Results: 3364 patients received valsartan and 9103 patients received enalapril. About 62% of patients treated with valsartan and 55% of patients treated with enalapril remained on therapy at 12 months after the initial dispensing, while 48% of patients treated with valsartan and 43% of patients treated with enalapril were persistent at 24 months. Patients treated with valsartan were about 20% more likely to stay on treatment than patients treated with enalapril (1 year RR(adj): 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16-1.32; 2 years RR(adj): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11-1.23).

Conclusions: Real-life persistence is higher with valsartan than with enalapril. The results of this and other studies on persistence in daily practice should be taken into account when deciding upon drug treatment for hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Medication persistence with valsartan and enalapril treatment in the first 2 years after the index date (adjusted curves based on the Cox proportional hazard analysis). Percentage of patients still using index drug at (a) 1 year after the index date: 61.6% for valsartan and 55.0% for enalapril and (b) 2 years after the index date: 47.8% for valsartan and 43.0% for enalapril (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Medication persistence assessed based on the use of the index drug or any other hypertensive drug during the first two years of follow-up (adjusted curves based on the Cox proportional hazard analysis).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bourgault C, Senecal M, Brisson M, et al. Persistence and discontinuation patterns of antihypertensive therapy among newly treated patients: a population-based study. J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19:607–13. - PubMed
    1. Breekveldt-Postma NS, Herings RM. Persistence with antihypertensives related to formulation: the case of nifedipine. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:237–42. - PubMed
    1. Caro JJ, Salas M, Speckman JL, et al. Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice. CMAJ. 1999a;160:31–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caro JJ, Speckman JL, Salas M, et al. Effect of initial drug choice on persistence with antihypertensive therapy: the importance of actual practice data. CMAJ. 1999b;160:41–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Catalan V, Lelorier J. Predictors of long-term persistence on statins in a subsidized clinical population. Value in Health. 2000;3:417–25. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms