Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization
- PMID: 18201703
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.007
Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate women's satisfaction and tolerance of hysteroscopic sterilization.
Design: Prospective analysis of case series.
Setting: Gynecology department in a teaching hospital.
Patient(s): A total of 1,630 women who underwent hysteroscopic sterilization by placement of Essure microinserts (Conceptus, Inc., Mountain View, CA) from January 2003 to June 2006.
Intervention(s): Transvaginal ultrasound examination, pelvic x-ray examination, and hysterosalpingography 3 months after sterilization with Essure microinserts. Satisfaction was assessed by a visual analog scale. Adverse effects and tolerance also were recorded.
Main outcome measure(s): Transvaginal ultrasound and pelvic x-ray confirmation of correct localization of microinserts and patient's satisfaction and tolerance after a 3-month follow-up.
Result(s): The rate of successful insertion was 99%. Most of women returned to their daily activities on the same day of insertion, and 86.5% considered the procedure painless or scarcely painful. All the patients were highly satisfied after hysteroscopic sterilization: 91% of subjects by visual analog scale (on a 0 to 10 scale) rated the method at 10 (high satisfaction degree), and none of the subjects rated it under 8. For patients, the most valuable aspects of the procedure were absence of surgery room (52.7%), method's quickness and comfort (19.9%), and permanent sterilization (18.2%). More than 97% of the patients said that they would recommend the procedure to others.
Conclusion(s): This study provides evidence that Essure microinserts can be placed in a usual gynecologic consultation room in standard conditions without any type of anesthesia or sedation and are associated with great overall patient satisfaction. Women also have high tolerance for the procedure and describe minor postoperative pain.
Similar articles
-
The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.BJOG. 2007 Jun;114(6):676-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01351.x. BJOG. 2007. PMID: 17516957
-
Female sterilisation: a cohort controlled comparative study of ESSURE versus laparoscopic sterilisation.BJOG. 2005 Nov;112(11):1522-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00726.x. BJOG. 2005. PMID: 16225573 Clinical Trial.
-
Techniques for removal of the Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device.Fertil Steril. 2007 Aug;88(2):497.e13-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.072. Epub 2007 Mar 29. Fertil Steril. 2007. PMID: 17397840
-
Permanent sterilization for the 21st century using the hysteroscopic approach.Surg Technol Int. 2004;13:115-9. Surg Technol Int. 2004. PMID: 15744682 Review.
-
Essure: a review six years later.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 May-Jun;16(3):282-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.02.009. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009. PMID: 19423060 Review.
Cited by
-
What are the factors predictive of hysterosalpingogram compliance after female sterilization by the Essure procedure in a publicly insured population?Matern Child Health J. 2013 Dec;17(10):1760-7. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1195-4. Matern Child Health J. 2013. PMID: 23212398
-
Initial experience with hysteroscopic tubal occlusion (Essure®).Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):130-4. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3717. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016. PMID: 27462885 Free PMC article.
-
Essure® present controversies and 5 years' learned lessons: a retrospective study with short- and long-term follow-up.Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1023-3. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Gynecol Surg. 2017. PMID: 29046622 Free PMC article.
-
Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.Contraception. 2012 Apr;85(4):384-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 27. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22036044 Free PMC article.
-
Pain management for tubal sterilization by hysteroscopy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;2012(8):CD009251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009251.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22895987 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical