Validation of the IDI-MRSA system for use on pooled nose, axilla, and groin swabs and single swabs from other screening sites
- PMID: 18201855
- DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.12.004
Validation of the IDI-MRSA system for use on pooled nose, axilla, and groin swabs and single swabs from other screening sites
Abstract
A commercial rapid polymerase chain reaction methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening method (IDI-MRSA) is validated for the use with nasal swabs transported in liquid Stuart's medium. We investigated the use of IDI-MRSA for screening for MRSA in pooled nose, axilla, and groin swabs and in single swabs from skin puncture sites, wounds, throat, rectum, and groin using swabs transported in Amies medium without charcoal. We performed the IDI-MRSA test on swabs that had been used for routine MRSA broth culture and which were selected to be about 50% MRSA positive. We compared the IDI-MRSA result with the MRSA culture result. With 201 pooled sets, the sensitivity of IDI-MRSA was 85% and the specificity 95%. With 32 single screening swabs, sensitivity was 94% and specificity 80%. The method is not compromised by swab transport in Amies medium if an additional heating step is used. We had a low rate of initial inhibition (1.3%), which may have been due to the extra heating step used to liquefy gel from the Amies medium. Thus, in this study IDI-MRSA gives similar results to culture with pooled or single swabs from multiple screening sites.
Similar articles
-
Concurrent analysis of nose and groin swab specimens by the IDI-MRSA PCR assay is comparable to analysis by individual-specimen PCR and routine culture assays for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;44(8):2904-8. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02211-05. J Clin Microbiol. 2006. PMID: 16891510 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of separate vs pooled swab cultures, different media, broth enrichment and anatomical sites of screening for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical specimens.J Hosp Infect. 2005 Oct;61(2):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2005.01.032. J Hosp Infect. 2005. PMID: 16026896
-
Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens.J Clin Microbiol. 2007 Apr;45(4):1098-101. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02208-06. Epub 2007 Feb 7. J Clin Microbiol. 2007. PMID: 17287320 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Dec;15 Suppl 7:10-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03092.x. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009. PMID: 19951329 Review.
-
The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus.Infect Genet Evol. 2008 Dec;8(6):747-63. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2008.07.007. Epub 2008 Jul 29. Infect Genet Evol. 2008. PMID: 18718557 Review.
Cited by
-
The "3 in 1" Study: Pooling Self-Taken Pharyngeal, Urethral, and Rectal Samples into a Single Sample for Analysis for Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in Men Who Have Sex with Men.J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Mar;54(3):650-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02460-15. Epub 2015 Dec 30. J Clin Microbiol. 2016. PMID: 26719439 Free PMC article.
-
Dutch guideline on the laboratory detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Jan;33(1):89-101. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1933-6. Epub 2013 Jul 27. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014. PMID: 23893016
-
Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Dec;48(12):4559-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01512-10. Epub 2010 Oct 20. J Clin Microbiol. 2010. PMID: 20962146 Free PMC article.
-
Throat and rectal swabs may have an important role in MRSA screening of critically ill patients.Intensive Care Med. 2008 Sep;34(9):1703-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1153-1. Epub 2008 May 24. Intensive Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18500421
-
MRSA screening by the Xpert MRSA PCR assay: pooling samples of the nose, throat, and groin increases the sensitivity of detection without increasing the laboratory costs.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;32(4):565-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1775-7. Epub 2012 Nov 10. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013. PMID: 23143041
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical