Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Aug;16(8):947-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-007-0362-4. Epub 2008 Jan 17.

Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC questionnaire

Affiliations

Patient satisfaction in outpatient cancer care: a prospective survey using The PASQOC questionnaire

Ulrich R Kleeberg et al. Support Care Cancer. 2008 Aug.

Abstract

Study objectives: To examine how outpatient cancer patients assess their cancer care in private oncology practices and day hospitals, and to identify the extent to which staff meet the expectations of their patients.

Setting: Private practices (n = 41) and day hospitals (n = 8) in Germany, including 16 "repeater" practices who had already participated in the 2002 Patient Satisfaction and Quality in Oncological Care (PASQOC) survey.

Participants: n = 4,615 patients with cancer. Diagnoses: 25% breast cancer, 21% colorectal cancer, 12% haematologic malignancies, 11% lymphomas; mean age 63.5 years; 57% female; n = 1,639 patients from repeater practices.

Measurements: The 2004 PASQOC questionnaire contained 63 problem-oriented items which covered 15 different dimensions of care. Practice staff invited their patients to participate and surveys were mailed to all sampled patients. For statistical analysis, the problem frequency (PF) was calculated for each item.

Results: Of 5,600 patients who received the questionnaire, 4,615 replied (response rate: 82%). The best results were obtained for the dimensions "further support in daily life" (3% PF), "nurses" (5% PF), and "physician-patient-relationship" (8% PF). Potential for improvement was most pronounced for "handling of side effects" (39% PF), "partnership and shared decision making" (30% PF), "side effects" (30% PF) and "communication with other patients" (26% PF). Considerable differences in PFs between practices were observed. Mean results from the 16 repeater practices revealed only few changes compared to the 2002 PASQOC survey, although some practices had greatly improved their performance.

Conclusions: The PASQOC questionnaire identified strengths and weaknesses of outpatient care for cancer patients. By providing a comparison with other practices, PASQOC can help staff of individual practices to improve their performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Support Care Cancer. 2005 May;13(5):303-10 - PubMed
    1. Pharm World Sci. 2005 Apr;27(2):96-103 - PubMed
    1. Rev Mal Respir. 2006 Jun;23(3 Pt 1):227-36 - PubMed
    1. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):259-66 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):881-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources