Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jan 21:8:15.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-15.

An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States

Affiliations
Comparative Study

An inter-country comparison of unofficial payments: results of a health sector social audit in the Baltic States

Anne Cockcroft et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Cross-country comparisons of unofficial payments in the health sector are sparse. In 2002 we conducted a social audit of the health sector of the three Baltic States.

Methods: Some 10,320 household interviews from a stratified, last-stage-random, sample of 30 clusters per country, together with institutional reviews, produced preliminary results. Separate focus groups of service users, nurses and doctors interpreted these findings. Stakeholder workshops in each country discussed the survey and focus group results.

Results: Nearly one half of the respondents did not consider unofficial payments to health workers to be corruption, yet one half (Estonia 43%, Latvia 45%, Lithuania 64%) thought the level of corruption in government health services was high. Very few (Estonia 1%, Latvia 3%, Lithuania 8%) admitted to making unofficial payments in their last contact with the services. Around 14% of household members across the three countries gave gifts in their last contact with government services.

Conclusion: This social audit allowed comparison of perceptions, attitudes and experience regarding unofficial payments in the health services of the three Baltic States. Estonia showed least corruption. Latvia was in the middle. Lithuania evidenced the most unofficial payments, the greatest mistrust towards the system. These findings can serve as a baseline for interventions, and to compare each country's approach to health service reform in relation to unofficial payments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographical distribution of unofficial payments made during most recent contact with government health services. This is a population weighted raster map of percent of households who made an unofficial payment in last contact with government health services, showing trends for the variable rather than absolute values at any given point on the map.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Geographical distribution of gifts given during most recent contact with government health services. This is a population weighted raster map of percent of households who gave a gift in last contact with government health services, showing trends for the variable rather than absolute values at any given point on the map.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Geographical distribution of willingness to pay to avoid waiting lists for surgery or other hospital treatment. This is a population weighted raster map of percent of households who would be willing to pay to avoid waiting lists for surgery or other hospital treatment, showing trends for the variable rather than absolute values at any given point on the map.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Meiesaar K, Lember M. Efficiency and sustainability of using resources in Estonian primary health care. Croatian Medical Journal. 2004;45:573–577. - PubMed
    1. Jesse M, Habicht J, Asviksoo A, Koppel A, Irs A, Thomson S. Health care in systems in transition: Estonia. WHO Regional Office for Europe on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Copenhagen; 2004.
    1. Polluste K, Mannik G, Axelsson R. Public health reforms in Estonia: impact on the health of the population. BMJ. 2005;331:210–213. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7510.210. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lember M. A policy of introducing a new contract and funding system of general practice in Estonia. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2002;17:41–53. doi: 10.1002/hpm.651. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Estonian Health Insurance Fund http://www.haigkassa.ee/eng/ehif/ Accessed 16 April 2007.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources