Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension
- PMID: 18209744
- PMCID: PMC2206541
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007
Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension
Abstract
The role of interference effects in sentence processing has recently begun to receive attention, however whether these effects arise during encoding or retrieval remains unclear. This paper draws on basic memory research to help distinguish these explanations and reports data from an experiment that manipulates the possibility for retrieval interference while holding encoding conditions constant. We found clear support for the principle of cue-overload, wherein cues available at retrieval cannot uniquely distinguish among competitors, thus giving rise to interference effects. We discuss the data in relation to a cue-based parsing framework (Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003) and other interference effects observed in sentence processing (e.g., Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001, 2004). We conclude from the available data that the memory system that subserves language comprehension operates according to similar principles as memory in other domains.
References
-
- Abney SP, Johnson M. Memory requirements and local ambiguities of parsing strategies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1991;20:233–250.
-
- Anderson MC, Neely JH. Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In: Bjork EL, Bjork RA, editors. Handbook of perception and memory, Memory. Vol. 10. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. pp. 237–313.
-
- Caplan D, Waters GS. Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1999;22:77–126. - PubMed
-
- Clark H. The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1973;12:335–359.
-
- Clark SE, Gronlund SD. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1996;3:37–60. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources