In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis
- PMID: 18210314
- DOI: 10.1080/02841850701678804
In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis
Abstract
Background: Stent implantation is the predominant therapy for non-surgical myocardial revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease. However, despite substantial advances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary imaging, a reliable detection of coronary in-stent restenosis is currently not possible.
Purpose: To examine the ability of 64-detector-row CT to detect and to grade in-stent stenosis in coronary stents using a newly developed ex-vivo vessel phantom with a realistic CT density pattern, artificial stenosis, and a thorax phantom.
Material and methods: Four different stents (Liberté and Lunar ROX, Boston Scientific; Driver, Medtronic; Multi-Link Vision, Guidant) were examined. The stents were placed on a polymer tube with a diameter of 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, or 4.0 mm. Different degrees of stenosis (0%, 30%, 50%, 70-80%) were created inside the tube. For quantitative analysis, attenuation values were measured in the non-stenotic vessel outside the stent, in the non-stenotic vessel inside the stent, and in the stenotic area inside the stent. The grade of stenosis was visually assessed by two observers.
Results: All stents led to artificial reduction of attenuation, the least degree of which was found in the Liberté stent (11.3+/-10.2 HU) and the Multi-Link Vision stent (17.6+/-17.9 HU; P = 0.25). Overall, the non-stenotic vessel was correctly diagnosed in 55.5%, the low-grade stenosis in 58.3%, the intermediate stenosis in 63.8%, and the high-grade stenosis in 80.5%. In the 3.0-, 3.5-, and 4.0-mm vessels, in none of the cases was a non-stenotic or low-grade stenotic vessel misdiagnosed as intermediate or high-grade stenosis. The average deviation from the real grade of stenosis was 0.40 for the Liberté stent, 0.46 for the Lunar ROX stent, 0.45 for the Driver stent, and 0.58 for the Multi-Link Vision stent.
Conclusion: Our ex-vivo data show that non-stenotic stents and low-grade in-stent stenosis can be reliably differentiated from intermediate and high-grade in-stent stenosis in vessels with a diameter of 3 to 4 mm. With regard to artifacts and the grading of stenoses, the Liberté stent was best suited for CT coronary angiography.
Similar articles
-
In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 Dec;96(12):883-90. doi: 10.1007/s00392-007-0564-2. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Clin Res Cardiol. 2007. PMID: 17694381
-
Detection of in-stent restenosis of coronary stents using 40-detector row computed tomography in vitro.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Mar-Apr;32(2):252-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e318075e5e0. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008. PMID: 18379312
-
In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners?Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):465-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.08.032. Epub 2007 Oct 29. Eur J Radiol. 2008. PMID: 17913428
-
Coronary CT angiography.J Nucl Med. 2006 May;47(5):797-806. J Nucl Med. 2006. PMID: 16644750 Review.
-
[Background and application of multi-slice CT in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Apr 7;151(14):805-11. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17469319 Review. Dutch.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical