U.S. Federal Regulations for emergency research: a practical guide and commentary
- PMID: 18211320
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2007.00001.x
U.S. Federal Regulations for emergency research: a practical guide and commentary
Abstract
Emergency medicine research requires the enrollment of subjects with varying decision-making capacities, including capable adults, adults incapacitated by illness or injury, and children. These different categories of subjects are protected by multiple federal regulations. These include the federal Common Rule, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations for pediatric research, and the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Final Rule for the Exception from the Requirements of Informed Consent in Emergency Situations. Investigators should be familiar with the relevant federal research regulations to optimally protect vulnerable research subjects, and to facilitate the institutional review board (IRB) review process. IRB members face particular challenges in reviewing emergency research. No regulations exist for research enrolling incapacitated subjects using proxy consent. The wording of the Final Rule may not optimally protect vulnerable subjects. It is also difficult to apply conflicting regulations to a single study that enroll subjects with differing decision-making capacities. This article is intended as a guide for emergency researchers and IRB members who review emergency research. It reviews the elements of Federal Regulations that apply to consent, subject selection, privacy protection, and the analysis of risks and benefits in all emergency research. It explores the challenges for IRB review listed above, and offers potential solutions to these problems.
Similar articles
-
Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.Arch Surg. 2006 Oct;141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.10.1019. Arch Surg. 2006. PMID: 17043281
-
Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.Wash Law Rev. 2003 Feb;78(1):229-63. Wash Law Rev. 2003. PMID: 15732212
-
Exception from informed consent: viewpoint of institutional review boards--balancing risks to subjects, community consultation, and future directions.Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.015. Acad Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16264073
-
Ethical and legal issues in emergency research: barriers to conducting prospective randomized trials in an emergency setting.J Surg Res. 2009 Nov;157(1):115-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.051. Epub 2009 May 3. J Surg Res. 2009. PMID: 19765724 Review.
-
Confronting the ethical challenges to informed consent in emergency medicine research.Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1082-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.05.028. Acad Emerg Med. 2004. PMID: 15466152 Review.
Cited by
-
The development of the DISCO-RC for measuring children's discomfort during research procedures.BMC Pediatr. 2017 Nov 29;17(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0949-y. BMC Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 29187148 Free PMC article.
-
The child's perspective on discomfort during medical research procedures: a descriptive study.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 1;7(7):e016077. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016077. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28765130 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical trial design in the neurocritical care unit.Neurocrit Care. 2012 Feb;16(1):6-19. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9608-6. Neurocrit Care. 2012. PMID: 21792753 Review.
-
The role of the enrolling clinician in emergency research conducted under an exception from informed consent.Theor Med Bioeth. 2025 Jun;46(3):231-246. doi: 10.1007/s11017-025-09710-9. Epub 2025 Apr 1. Theor Med Bioeth. 2025. PMID: 40167889 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources