Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb;43(1 Pt 1):32-53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00751.x.

Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors

Tatyana A Shamliyan  1 , Sue Duval, Jing Du, Robert L Kane
Affiliations
Review

Just what the doctor ordered. Review of the evidence of the impact of computerized physician order entry system on medication errors

Tatyana A Shamliyan et al. Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between computerization of physician orders and prescribing medication errors. Data Sources. Studies published in English language were identified through MEDLINE (1990 through December 2005), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and bibliographies of retrieved articles. Of 252 identified in the search, 12 (4.8 percent) original investigations that compared rates of prescribing medication errors with handwritten and computerized physician orders were included.

Data collection: Information on study design, participant characteristics, clinical settings, and outcomes rates were abstracted independently by two investigators using a standardized protocol.

Principal findings: Compared with handwritten orders, 80 percent of studies (8/10 studies) reported a significant reduction in total prescribing errors, 43 percent in dosing errors (3/7 studies), and 37.5 percent in adverse drug events (3/8 studies). The use of computerized orders was associated with a 66 percent reduction in total prescribing errors in adults (odds ratio [OR]=0.34; 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.52) and a positive tendency in children (p for interaction=.028). The benefit of computerized orders was larger when the rate of errors was more than 12 percent with handwritten orders (p for interaction=.022). Significant heterogeneity in the results compromised pooled relative risks. One randomized controlled intervention demonstrated the greatest benefits of computerized orders on total prescribing errors (OR=0.02, 95 percent CI 0.01-0.02) and dosing errors (OR=0.28; 95 percent CI 0.15-0.52) with 775 avoided prescribing errors (95 percent CI 752-811) per 1,000 orders in a pediatric hospital.

Conclusions: Computerization of physicians' orders shows great promise. It will be more effective when linked to other computerized systems to detect and prevent prescribing errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual Model of the Association between Physician Prescriptions, Medication Errors, and Adverse Drug Events *Intercepted medication errors are medication errors with significant potential to harm a patient that did not actually reach a patient. They may result in adverse drug events not related to errors and therefore not preventable (severe cough after ACE inhibitors or vision loss after Sidenafil). Not intercepted errors may result in treatment effects (methicillin was prescribed for a patient allergic to penicillin, allergy did not occur, a patient recovered from bacterial infection) and preventable adverse events (allergic shock). **Adverse drug events are injuries (clinical outcomes) resulting from drug use. Adverse drug events associated with a medication error are considered preventable
Figure 2
Figure 2
Odds Ratios of Medication Prescribing Errors and Adverse Drug Events with Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) System Compared with Handwritten Orders. Box Size Is Proportional to Individual Study Precision
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ash JS, Gorman PN, Seshadri V, Hersh WR. Computerized Physician Order Entry in U.S. Hospitals: Results of a 2002 Survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2004;11(2):95–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aspden P Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Identifying and Preventing Medication Errors. Preventing Medication Errors. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. Bates DW, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Servi D, Laffel G, Sweitzer BJ, Shea BF, Hallisey R, Vander Vliet M, Nemeskal R, Leape LL. Incidence of Adverse Drug Events and Potential Adverse Drug Events. Implications for Prevention. ADE Prevention Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1995b;274(1):29–34. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, Burdick E, Hickey M, Kleefield S, Shea B, Vander Vliet M, Seger DL. Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1998;280(15):1311–6. - PubMed
    1. Bates DW, Spell N, Cullen DJ, Burdick E, Laird N, Petersen LA, Small SD, Sweitzer BJ, Leape LL. The Costs of Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized Patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;277(4):307–11. - PubMed

MeSH terms