Allometric scaling of uphill cycling performance
- PMID: 18213539
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989441
Allometric scaling of uphill cycling performance
Abstract
Previous laboratory-based investigations have identified optimal body mass scaling exponents in the range 0.79-0.91 for uphill cycling. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate whether or not these exponents are also valid in a field setting. A proportional allometric model was used to predict the optimal power-to-mass ratios associated with road-based uphill time-trial cycling performance. The optimal power function models predicting mean cycle speed during a 5.3 km, 5.4% road hill-climb time-trial were (VO(2max) x m(-1.24))(0.55) and (RMP(max) x m(-1.04))(0.54), explained variance being 84.6% and 70.5%, respectively. Slightly higher mass exponents were observed when the mass predictor was replaced with the combined mass of cyclist and equipment (m(C)). Uphill cycling speed was proportional to (VO(2max) x m(C)(-1.33))(0.57) and (RMP(max) x m(C)(-1.10))(0.59). The curvilinear exponents, 0.54-0.59, identified a relatively strong curvilinear relationship between cycling speed and energy cost, suggesting that air resistance remains influential when cycling up a gradient of 5.4%. These results provide some support for previously reported uphill cycling mass exponents derived in laboratories. However, the exponents reported here were a little higher than those reported previously, a finding possibly explained by a lack of geometric similarity in this sample.
Similar articles
-
Flat and uphill climb time trial performance prediction in elite amateur cyclists.Int J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;28(4):306-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-924356. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Int J Sports Med. 2007. PMID: 17024629
-
The power profile predicts road cycling MMP.Int J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;31(6):397-401. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247528. Epub 2010 Mar 18. Int J Sports Med. 2010. PMID: 20301046
-
Effects of prior heavy exercise on energy supply and 4000-m cycling performance.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jan;41(1):221-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818313b6. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009. PMID: 19092685
-
The influence of body mass in endurance bicycling.Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jan;26(1):58-63. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994. PMID: 8133740 Review.
-
Allometric scaling of maximal metabolic rate in mammals: muscle aerobic capacity as determinant factor.Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004 May 20;140(2):115-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2004.01.006. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2004. PMID: 15134660 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of low and high cadence interval training on power output in flat and uphill cycling time-trials.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jan;112(1):69-78. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1957-5. Epub 2011 Apr 11. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012. PMID: 21479957 Clinical Trial.
-
Validity and reliability of critical power field testing.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Jan;115(1):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-3001-z. Epub 2014 Sep 27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015. PMID: 25260244
-
Oxygen uptake at different intensities and sub-techniques predicts sprint performance in elite male cross-country skiers.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Dec;114(12):2587-95. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2980-0. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014. PMID: 25138966
-
Optimal [Formula: see text] ratio for predicting 15 km performance among elite male cross-country skiers.Open Access J Sports Med. 2015 Dec 16;6:353-360. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S93174. eCollection 2015. Open Access J Sports Med. 2015. PMID: 26719730 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal body mass normalization of power output for accurate prediction of estimated cycling performance over complex time-trial courses.Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Aug 18;7:1599319. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1599319. eCollection 2025. Front Sports Act Living. 2025. PMID: 40901017 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources