Quantitative PET with positron emitters that emit prompt gamma rays
- PMID: 18215872
- DOI: 10.1109/42.476109
Quantitative PET with positron emitters that emit prompt gamma rays
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to determine the feasibility of using positron emitting isotopes that emit prompt gammas to acquire quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) data using standard PET instrumentation. Prompt gammas can contaminate PET data by increasing dead time, converting singles into invalid coincidences, and producing multiple coincidences which can lead to the replacement of valid coincidences by invalid coincidences. The measurements in this work were made by scanning point sources containing F-18, Na-22, and Co-60 and studying the effects of the prompt gammas on the PET data, We found that for the Na-22 point source, the annihilation photon coincidence rate was about 25 times the prompt gamma-annihilation photon coincidence rate in the entire active volume of the scanner. With scatter, the Na-22 prompt gamma-annihilation photon coincidence rate was 1.3 times higher than the F-18 scatter coincidence rate. The most significant effect of the prompt gamma was to increase dead time; the dead time correction factor for Cu-60 was 2.4 times higher than the correction factor for N-13 for the same source activity. We conclude that, in many cases, quantitative PET data can be readily obtained with isotopes that emit prompt gammas, using standard PET 2-D instrumentation. However there are some cases, such as 3-D PET, where prompt gammas could significantly contaminate the PET data.
Similar articles
-
Three-dimensional positron emission tomography imaging with 124I and 86Y.Nucl Med Commun. 2006 Mar;27(3):237-45. doi: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000199476.46525.2c. Nucl Med Commun. 2006. PMID: 16479243
-
Dual-isotope PET using positron-gamma emitters.Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 21;56(14):4539-56. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/020. Epub 2011 Jul 1. Phys Med Biol. 2011. PMID: 21725143
-
Simulation of triple coincidences in PET.Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 7;60(1):117-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/1/117. Epub 2014 Dec 5. Phys Med Biol. 2015. PMID: 25479147
-
Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion.EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40658-016-0144-5. Epub 2016 May 23. EJNMMI Phys. 2016. PMID: 27271304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
PET imaging problems with the non-standard positron emitters Yttrium-86 and Iodine-124.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008 Jun;52(2):159-65. Epub 2007 Nov 28. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18043538 Review.
Cited by
-
Development of a novel linearly-filled Derenzo microPET phantom.Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul 6;6(3):199-204. eCollection 2016. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016. PMID: 27508106 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of scandium-44 g with other PET radionuclides in pre-clinical PET phantom imaging.EJNMMI Phys. 2019 Dec 12;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40658-019-0260-0. EJNMMI Phys. 2019. PMID: 31832809 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters.EJNMMI Phys. 2017 Dec;4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40658-017-0178-3. Epub 2017 Feb 15. EJNMMI Phys. 2017. PMID: 28205113 Free PMC article.
-
Quantitation in PET using isotopes emitting prompt single gammas: application to yttrium-86.Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Mar;30(3):354-61. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1068-y. Epub 2002 Dec 17. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003. PMID: 12634962
-
Precision and accuracy of clinical quantification of myocardial blood flow by dynamic PET: A technical perspective.J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Oct;22(5):935-51. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0100-0. Epub 2015 Apr 14. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 25868451 Review.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources