Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials--a 12 months study
- PMID: 18217452
Clinical comparison of flowable composite to other fissure sealing materials--a 12 months study
Abstract
The subject of the study was the clinical analysis of six different sealing materials over a 12-months period. It was necessary to prove the clinical success of sealing with flowable composite with the use of adhesive system and preventing effect of sealants on caries developement. Our study included children aged from 6 to 15, and we sealed 326 teeth with materials from the group of flowable composites in combination with adhesive system (Admira Bond+Admira Flow, Excite+Tetric Flow) and other sealing resins (Teethmate F1, Admira Seal, Helioseal Clear Chroma, Fissurit FX). Over a 12-months period, the total retention was 83.3% (Tetric Flow), 81.5% (Admira Seal), 81.5% (Fissurit FX), 76.4% (Teethmate F1), 75.9% (Helioseal Clear Chroma) and 74.6% (Admira Flow). Only 5 molars (1.5%) developed clinical caries, so fissure sealing has showed to be an excelent prevention of occlusal caries. Flowable composites used with adhesive system are equal to other sealing materials. Sealing materials show great and durable preventive effect against caries development in the fissure system. Since there are many different sealing materials, adhesives, flowable composites on the market and many different pretreatments of the enamel, future studies are necessary and should have an aim to investigate the best technique and material for fissure sealing.
Similar articles
-
[Clinical evaluation of three different materials for fissure sealing after 12 months].Acta Med Croatica. 2006 Jun;60(3):209-14. Acta Med Croatica. 2006. PMID: 16933833 Croatian.
-
Evaluation of Different Fissure Sealant Materials and Flowable Composites Used as Pit-and-fissure Sealants: A 24-Month Clinical Trial.Pediatr Dent. 2015 Sep-Oct;37(5):468-73. Pediatr Dent. 2015. PMID: 26531092 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.J Dent. 2014 Feb;42(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015. Epub 2013 Dec 1. J Dent. 2014. PMID: 24296163 Clinical Trial.
-
Sealants: where we have been; where we are going.Gen Dent. 2002 Sep-Oct;50(5):438-40. Gen Dent. 2002. PMID: 12448896 Review.
-
A clinical evaluation of a light-cured fissure sealant (Helioseal).ASDC J Dent Child. 1989 Mar-Apr;56(2):97-102. ASDC J Dent Child. 1989. PMID: 2656793 Review.
Cited by
-
Flowable composite as fissure sealing material? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Br Dent J. 2018 Jan 26;224(2):92-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.40. Br Dent J. 2018. PMID: 29372708
-
Comparison of the Success Rate of Filled and Unfilled Resin-Based Fissure Sealants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Dent. 2022 Feb 8;19:10. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i10.8855. eCollection 2022. Front Dent. 2022. PMID: 35937149 Free PMC article.
-
Fissure sealant materials: Wear resistance of flowable composite resins.J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016;10(3):194-9. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2016.031. Epub 2016 Aug 17. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2016. PMID: 27651887 Free PMC article.
-
Retention of pit and fissure sealants versus flowable composites in permanent teeth: A systematic review.Heliyon. 2020 Sep 24;6(9):e04964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04964. eCollection 2020 Sep. Heliyon. 2020. PMID: 33005790 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In Vitro Microleakage Comparison of Flowable Nanocomposites and Conventional Materials Used in Pit and Fissure Sealant Therapy.Front Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;16(1):21-30. doi: 10.18502/fid.v16i1.1105. Epub 2019 Jan 20. Front Dent. 2019. PMID: 31608333 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical