Searching in dynamic displays: effects of configural predictability and spatiotemporal continuity
- PMID: 18217807
- DOI: 10.1167/7.14.12
Searching in dynamic displays: effects of configural predictability and spatiotemporal continuity
Abstract
A visual search task was used to probe how well attention can operate over a dynamically changing visual display. Participants searched for a target item among an array of distractor items while the items either shifted location several times per second or remained stationary. Not surprisingly, Experiment 1 showed that shifting display items slowed search. However, search was faster if the shift preserved the global, configural structure of the display. The results of Experiment 2 suggest that the benefit of maintaining configural structure comes from improved spatial predictability: Knowing where the searchable items will be at any given moment enables faster search. Finally, Experiment 3 shows that, given spatiotemporal continuity, attention can operate just as efficiently over a dynamically changing display as it can over a stationary display. In the real world, objects often move, but they do so in a predictable way. The current findings suggest that the mechanisms underlying search can capitalize on configural predictability and spatiotemporal continuity to enable efficient search in such dynamic situations.
Similar articles
-
Spatiotemporal segregation in visual search: evidence from parietal lesions.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Aug;30(4):667-88. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.667. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004. PMID: 15301617 Clinical Trial.
-
Measuring visual clutter.J Vis. 2007 Aug 16;7(2):17.1-22. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17. J Vis. 2007. PMID: 18217832
-
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16. Vision Res. 2010. PMID: 20025896
-
Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jan;63(1):31-41. doi: 10.1080/17470210903150738. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010. PMID: 19728228
-
Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1300-1315. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0978-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26635097 Review.
Cited by
-
Shape representation modulating the effect of motion on visual search performance.Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 2;7(1):14921. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14999-1. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29097713 Free PMC article.
-
New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 29;4:8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00008. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 23372555 Free PMC article.
-
Multiple-object tracking and visually guided touch.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Jul;83(5):1907-1927. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02291-4. Epub 2021 Mar 30. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021. PMID: 33786750
-
Losing the trees for the forest in dynamic visual search.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 May;42(5):617-30. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000186. Epub 2015 Dec 21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016. PMID: 26689307 Free PMC article.
-
Dissociating implicit and explicit ensemble representations reveals the limits of visual perception and the richness of behavior.Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83358-y. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33594160 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources