Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan 24:9:1.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-1.

Outcome of a research ethics training workshop among clinicians and scientists in a Nigerian university

Affiliations

Outcome of a research ethics training workshop among clinicians and scientists in a Nigerian university

Ademola J Ajuwon et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: In Nigeria, as in other developing countries, access to training in research ethics is limited, due to weak social, economic, and health infrastructure. The project described in this article was designed to develop the capacity of academic staff of the College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria to conduct ethically acceptable research involving human participants.

Methods: Three in-depth interviews and one focus group discussion were conducted to assess the training needs of participants. A research ethics training workshop was then conducted with College of Medicine faculty. A 23-item questionnaire that assessed knowledge of research ethics, application of principles of ethics, operations of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and ethics reasoning was developed to be a pre-post test evaluation of the training workshop. Ninety-seven workshop participants completed the questionnaire before and after the workshop; 59 of them completed a second post-test questionnaire one month after the workshop.

Results: The trainees came from a multi-disciplinary background including medicine, nursing, pharmacy, social science and laboratory science. The mean scores for knowledge of the principles of research ethics rose from 0.67 out of 3 points at pre-test to 2.25 at post-test (p < 0.05). Also, 42% correctly mentioned one international guideline or regulation at pretest, with most of those knowing of the Declaration of Helsinki. Trainees' knowledge of the operations of an IRB increased from 6.05 at pre-test to 6.29 at post test out of 7 points. Overall, participants retained much of the knowledge acquired from the workshop one month after its completion.

Conclusion: The training improved participants' knowledge of principles of research ethics, international guidelines and regulations and operations of IRBs. It thus provided an opportunity for research ethics capacity development among academic staff in a developing country institution.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jeffers BR. Continuing education in research ethics for the clinical nurse. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing. 2002;33:265–269. - PubMed
    1. United States of America Code of Federal Regulations. 2002.
    1. Cohn F, Manetta A. A teachable moment: research ethic revisited. American Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology. 2003;188:2. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.122. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosenstein DL, Miller FG, Rubinow DR. A curriculum for teaching psychiatric research bioethics. Biological Psychiatry. 2001;50:802–808. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01236-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sponholz G. Teaching scientific integrity and research ethics. Forensic Science International. 2000;113:511–154. doi: 10.1016/S0379-0738(00)00267-X. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources