Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis
- PMID: 18218122
- PMCID: PMC2245977
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-227X-8-1
Systematic review of randomized clinical trials on the use of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis
Abstract
Background: Patients with sepsis typically require large resuscitation volumes, but the optimal type of fluid remains unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate current evidence on the effectiveness and safety of hydroxyethyl starch for fluid management in sepsis.
Methods: Computer searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were performed using search terms that included hydroxyethyl starch; hetastarch; shock, septic; sepsis; randomized controlled trials; and random allocation. Additional methods were examination of reference lists and hand searching. Randomized clinical trials comparing hydroxyethyl starch with other fluids in patients with sepsis were selected. Data were extracted on numbers of patients randomized, specific indication, fluid regimen, follow-up, endpoints, hydroxyethyl starch volume infused and duration of administration, and major study findings.
Results: Twelve randomized trials involving a total of 1062 patients were included. Ten trials (83%) were acute studies with observation periods of 5 days or less, most frequently assessing cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic variables. Two trials were designed as outcome studies with follow-up for 34 and 90 days, respectively. Hydroxyethyl starch increased the incidence of acute renal failure compared both with gelatin (odds ratio, 2.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-5.83) and crystalloid (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.71). In the largest and most recent trial a trend was observed toward increased overall mortality among hydroxyethyl starch recipients (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.95), and mortality was higher (p < 0.001) in patients receiving > 22 mL.kg-1 hydroxyethyl starch per day than lower doses.
Conclusion: Hydroxyethyl starch increases the risk of acute renal failure among patients with sepsis and may also reduce the probability of survival. While the evidence reviewed cannot necessarily be applied to other clinical indications, hydroxyethyl starch should be avoided in sepsis.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effects of fluid resuscitation with synthetic colloids or crystalloids alone on shock reversal, fluid balance, and patient outcomes in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective sequential analysis.Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2543-51. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318258fee7. Crit Care Med. 2012. PMID: 22903091
-
Hydroxyethyl starch for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients.Can J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;60(7):709-13. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9936-4. Epub 2013 Apr 20. Can J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23604905
-
Renal effects of synthetic colloids and crystalloids in patients with severe sepsis: a prospective sequential comparison.Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1335-42. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318212096a. Crit Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21358396
-
Renal impact of fluid management with colloids: a comparative review.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Sep;23(9):721-38. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000639. Epub 2006 May 24. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006. PMID: 16723059 Review.
-
What is the Preferred Resuscitation Fluid for Patients with Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock?J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):928-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.08.093. Epub 2017 Oct 25. J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 29079487 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of molecular weight and substitution on tissue uptake of hydroxyethyl starch: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Apr 1;51(4):225-36. doi: 10.2165/11594700-000000000-00000. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012. PMID: 22420578 Review.
-
Effects of a predominantly hydroxyethyl starch (HES)-based and a predominantly non HES-based fluid therapy on renal function in surgical ICU patients.Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep;35(9):1539-47. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1509-1. Epub 2009 Jun 17. Intensive Care Med. 2009. PMID: 19533095
-
Pro/con debate: should synthetic colloids be used in patients with septic shock?Crit Care. 2009;13(1):203. doi: 10.1186/cc7147. Epub 2009 Jan 29. Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19226441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Colloid-induced kidney injury: experimental evidence may help to understand mechanisms.Crit Care. 2009;13(2):130. doi: 10.1186/cc7745. Epub 2009 Apr 3. Crit Care. 2009. PMID: 19435473 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative effect of propofol versus sevoflurane on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;10(3):301-7. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.174907. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27375385 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pittet D, Thievent B, Wenzel RP, Li N, Auckenthaler R, Suter PM. Bedside prediction of mortality from bacteremic sepsis. A dynamic analysis of ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:684–693. - PubMed
-
- Yu DT, Platt R, Lanken PN, Black E, Sands KE, Schwartz JS, Hibberd PL, Graman PS, Kahn KL, Snydman DR, Parsonnet J, Moore R, Bates DW. Relationship of pulmonary artery catheter use to mortality and resource utilization in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2734–2741. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000098028.68323.64. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources