Endoscopic feeding tube placement in patients with cancer: a prospective clinical audit of 2055 procedures in 1866 patients
- PMID: 18221411
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03621.x
Endoscopic feeding tube placement in patients with cancer: a prospective clinical audit of 2055 procedures in 1866 patients
Abstract
Background: Feeding tube placement in patients with aero-digestive cancer is challenging because of the distortion and/or obstruction of the upper digestive passage. As a result, many patients may receive intravenous fluids and parenteral nutrition instead of enteral feeds.
Aim: To audit all the endoscopic feeding tube placements in large sample of patients to determine difficulties, success, reasons for failures and procedure-related complications.
Methods: Audit of all consecutive feeding tube placements from January 1996 to December 2003 was conducted. Tubes were placed depending on the site of cancer and anticipated duration of feeding: naso-gastric tubes, naso-enteral tubes and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutrition support team evaluated these patients. Technical modifications, difficulties, success and complications encountered during the procedure were recorded.
Results: Two thousand and fifty-five attempts were made for feeding tube placements (naso-gastric tube - 1637, naso-enteral tube - 177 and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy - 241) in 1866 patients. Technical success was achieved in 1969 (96%, 95% CI: 95-97%). Immediate complications occurred in 62 (3%, 95% CI: 2-4%), seven needed hospitalization and one patient died of tumour perforation caused by naso-gastric tube placement. The technical success and complications rates of the procedures performed by fellows in training were comparable to those performed by attending consultants.
Conclusions: Enteral feeding tubes can be placed in almost all patients with cancer using endoscopic techniques. Adequate training of the endoscopy fellows and sufficient care by nutrition support team help achieve high success with few complications.
Similar articles
-
Enteral nutrition during the treatment of head and neck carcinoma: is a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube preferable to a nasogastric tube?Cancer. 2001 May 1;91(9):1785-90. Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11335904
-
Evaluation of percutaneous endoscopic feeding tube placement in obese patients.Nutr Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;24(6):723-7. doi: 10.1177/0884533609349250. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009. PMID: 19955550
-
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long term enteral nutrition.Natl Med J India. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):52-5. Natl Med J India. 1992. PMID: 1304263
-
Endoscopic approaches to enteral nutritional support.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(3):605-30. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.02.002. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16782532 Review.
-
Small bowel endoscopic enteral access.Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;25(2):155-9. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0b013e328324f86b. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19528883 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Endoscopy in Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.Diseases. 2022 Dec 27;11(1):3. doi: 10.3390/diseases11010003. Diseases. 2022. PMID: 36648868 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients: predictors of 30-day complications, 30-day mortality, and overall mortality.Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Mar;58(3):768-76. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2397-8. Epub 2012 Sep 25. Dig Dis Sci. 2013. PMID: 23007733
-
Palliative percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement for gastrointestinal cancer: Roles, goals, and complications.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Apr 16;7(4):364-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.364. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25901215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Factors predicting major complications, mortality, and recovery in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.JGH Open. 2021 Mar 31;5(5):590-598. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12538. eCollection 2021 May. JGH Open. 2021. PMID: 34013060 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials