Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study
- PMID: 18222431
- PMCID: PMC2652861
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.070
Bone mineral density in adolescent females using injectable or oral contraceptives: a 24-month prospective study
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether bone mineral density (BMD) is lower in hormonal-contraceptive users than in an untreated comparison group.
Design: Observational, prospective cohort; 24-month duration.
Setting: Adolescent clinics in a metropolitan Midwestern setting.
Patient(s): Four hundred thirty-three postmenarcheal girls, 12-18 years of age, who were on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA; n = 58), were on oral contraceptives (OCs; n = 187), or were untreated (n = 188).
Intervention(s): Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and OCs containing 100 microg of levonorgestrel and 20 microg of ethinyl E(2).
Main outcome measure(s): Measurements of BMD at spine and femoral neck were obtained by using dual x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 6-month intervals.
Result(s): Over 24 months, mean percentage change in spine BMD was as follows: DMPA, -1.5%; OC, +4.2%; and untreated, +6.3%. Mean percentage change in femoral neck BMD was as follows: DMPA, -5.2%; OC, +3.0%; and untreated, +3.8%. Statistical significance was found between the DMPA group and the other two groups. In the DMPA group, mean percentage change in spine BMD over the first 12 months was -1.4%; the rate of change slowed to -0.1% over the second 12 months. No bone density loss reached the level of osteopenia.
Conclusion(s): Adolescent girls receiving DMPA had significant loss in BMD, compared with bone gain in the OC and untreated group. However, the clinical significance of this finding is mitigated by slowed loss after the 1st year of DMPA use and general maintenance of bone density values within the normal range in the DMPA group.
Similar articles
-
Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls.J Adolesc Health. 2004 Dec;35(6):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.07.005. J Adolesc Health. 2004. PMID: 15581522
-
Bone mineral density at various anatomic bone sites in women receiving combined oral contraceptives and depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.Contraception. 2002 Jun;65(6):407-10. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00308-6. Contraception. 2002. PMID: 12127638
-
Bone density in women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.BMJ. 1991 Jul 6;303(6793):13-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6793.13. BMJ. 1991. PMID: 1830502 Free PMC article.
-
Depo Provera. Position paper on clinical use, effectiveness and side effects.Br J Fam Plann. 1999 Jul;25(2):69-76. Br J Fam Plann. 1999. PMID: 10454658 Review.
-
[Status of bone mineral density after the long-standing application of contraception Depo-Provera].Ceska Gynekol. 2013 Jan;78(1):116-24. Ceska Gynekol. 2013. PMID: 23607391 Review. Czech.
Cited by
-
Oral contraceptive use and bone density in adolescent and young adult women.Contraception. 2010 Jan;81(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2009.07.001. Contraception. 2010. PMID: 20004271 Free PMC article.
-
The National Osteoporosis Foundation's position statement on peak bone mass development and lifestyle factors: a systematic review and implementation recommendations.Osteoporos Int. 2016 Apr;27(4):1281-1386. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3440-3. Epub 2016 Feb 8. Osteoporos Int. 2016. PMID: 26856587 Free PMC article.
-
Site-specific differences in bone mineral density in black and white premenopausal South African women.Osteoporos Int. 2012 Feb;23(2):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1570-9. Epub 2011 Mar 3. Osteoporos Int. 2012. PMID: 21369790
-
Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children.Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020 Feb 24;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0411-9. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020. PMID: 32093703 Free PMC article.
-
Bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescents during use of norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives and after discontinuation of norethisterone enanthate.Contraception. 2009 May;79(5):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.11.009. Epub 2009 Jan 17. Contraception. 2009. PMID: 19341845 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sabatier JP, Guaydier-Souquieres G, Benmalek A, Marcelli C. Evolution of bone mineral content during adolescence and adulthood: A longitudinal study in 295 healthy females 10–24 years of age and 206 premenopausal women. Osteo Int. 1999;9:476–82. - PubMed
-
- Cromer BA, Blair JM, Mahan JD, Zibners L, Naumovski Z. A prospective comparison of bone density in adolescent girls on depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera), Levonorgestrel (Norplant), or oral contraceptives. J Pediatr. 1996;129:671–6. - PubMed
-
- Cromer BA, Stager M, Bonny A, Lazebnik R, Rome E, Debanne S. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate, oral contraceptives and bone mineral density in a cohort of adolescent girls. J of Adolesc Health. 2004;35:434–41. - PubMed
-
-
FDA Talk Paper. Black box warning added concerning long-term use of Depo-Provera Contraceptive Injection. U.S. Food and Drug Administration website, posted November 17, 2004.
-
-
- Westhoff C. Trends in oral contraceptive development and utilization: Looking to the future. Contracept Rep. 1997;7:4–13. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical