Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Dec;100(12):1042-7.

[Evaluation of left ventricular function: echocardiography, MRI or CT?]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 18223520
Review

[Evaluation of left ventricular function: echocardiography, MRI or CT?]

[Article in French]
J Garot et al. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

The objective of this article is to clarify the advantages and limits of echocardiography, MRI, and CT for the determination of left ventricular (LV) function, emphasising the importance of evaluating global ventricular function. MRI is the reference technique, owing to its precision, reproducibility, and innocuous nature. However, echography is performed much more frequently because it is more widely available and easier to carry out. It is our reference technique in everyday practice. More recently, synchronised multi-slice tomodensitometry has provided dynamic reconstructed images of the left ventricle throughout the cardiac cycle, offering a succession of short axis views covering the entire volume of the ventricle. These acquisitions, in addition to non-invasive coronary angiography, allow the LV ejection fraction to be determined. With MRI, study of the LV function does not require any contrast medium to be injected and makes use of effective semi-automatic segmentation programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources