Differences in daily energy expenditure in lean and obese women: the role of posture allocation
- PMID: 18223609
- DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.15
Differences in daily energy expenditure in lean and obese women: the role of posture allocation
Abstract
Objective: A low resting metabolic rate (RMR) is considered a risk factor for weight gain and obesity; however, due to the greater fat-free mass (FFM) found in obesity, detecting an impairment in RMR is difficult. The purposes of this study were to determine the RMR in lean and obese women controlling for FFM and investigate activity energy expenditure (AEE) and daily activity patterns in the two groups.
Methods and procedures: Twenty healthy, non-smoking, pre-menopausal women (10 lean and 10 obese) participated in this 14-day observational study on free-living energy balance. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry; AEE and total energy expenditure (TEE) were calculated using doubly labeled water (DLW), and activity patterns were investigated using monitors. Body composition including FFM and fat mass (FM) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
Results: RMR was similar in the obese vs. lean women (1601 +/- 109 vs. 1505 +/- 109 kcal/day, respectively, P = 0.12, adjusting for FFM and FM). Obese women sat 2.5 h more each day (12.7 +/- 3.2 h vs. 10.1 +/- 2.0 h, P < 0.05), stood 2 h less (2.7 +/- 1.0 h vs. 4.7 +/- 2.2 h, P = 0.02) and spent half as much time in activity than lean women (2.6 +/- 1.5 h vs. 5.4 +/- 1.9 h, P = 0.002).
Discussion: RMR was not lower in the obese women; however, they were more sedentary and expended less energy in activity than the lean women. If the obese women adopted the activity patterns of the lean women, including a modification of posture allocation, an additional 300 kcal could be expended every day.
Similar articles
-
Effects of habitual physical activity on the resting metabolic rates and body compositions of women aged 35 to 50 years.J Am Diet Assoc. 2001 Oct;101(10):1181-8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00289-9. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001. PMID: 11678489
-
Impact of indexing resting metabolic rate against fat-free mass determined by different body composition models.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Aug;58(8):1132-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601941. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004. PMID: 15054426
-
Energy expenditure adjusted for body composition differentiates constitutional thinness from both normal subjects and anorexia nervosa.Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Jan;292(1):E132-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00241.2006. Epub 2006 Aug 15. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2007. PMID: 16912058
-
Physical activity and resting metabolic rate.Proc Nutr Soc. 2003 Aug;62(3):621-34. doi: 10.1079/PNS2003282. Proc Nutr Soc. 2003. PMID: 14692598 Review.
-
Body size, energy metabolism and lifespan.J Exp Biol. 2005 May;208(Pt 9):1717-30. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01556. J Exp Biol. 2005. PMID: 15855403 Review.
Cited by
-
A hybrid online intervention for reducing sedentary behavior in obese women.Front Public Health. 2013 Oct 28;1:45. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2013.00045. eCollection 2013. Front Public Health. 2013. PMID: 24350214 Free PMC article.
-
Gait and Function in Class III Obesity.J Obes. 2012;2012:257468. doi: 10.1155/2012/257468. Epub 2012 Feb 16. J Obes. 2012. PMID: 22496967 Free PMC article.
-
Endurance capacity, not body size, determines physical activity levels: role of skeletal muscle PEPCK.PLoS One. 2009 Jun 12;4(6):e5869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005869. PLoS One. 2009. PMID: 19521512 Free PMC article.
-
Energy expenditure in adults living in developing compared with industrialized countries: a meta-analysis of doubly labeled water studies.Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Feb;93(2):427-41. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.110.007278. Epub 2010 Dec 15. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011. PMID: 21159791 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of body mass index on revision rates after primary total knee arthroplasty.Int Orthop. 2016 Apr;40(4):723-9. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3031-0. Epub 2015 Nov 12. Int Orthop. 2016. PMID: 26559943
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials