Aspects of eating behaviors "disinhibition" and "restraint" are related to weight gain and BMI in women

Abstract

Objective: The causes of adult weight gain leading to obesity are uncertain. We examined the association of adult weight gain and obesity with subscales of eating behavior characteristics in older women.

Methods and procedures: Current height and weight, eating behavior subscales (disinhibition subscales-habitual, situational, and emotional; restraint subscales-flexible and rigid; hunger subscales-internal and external) as assessed using the Eating Inventory (EI), and self-reported body weight at six prior age intervals were reported by 535 women aged 55-65 years. Multiple regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between EI subscale scores and weight change from the age interval of 30-39 to 55-60 years and current BMI.

Results: The strongest correlate of weight gain over 20 years was susceptibility to overeating in response to everyday cues within the environment (habitual disinhibition; partial correlation coefficient (r) = 0.25, P < 0.001); susceptibility to overeating in response to emotional states such as depression (emotional disinhibition) was a quantitatively weaker but significant correlate (partial r = 0.17, P < 0.001), and susceptibility to overeating in response to specific situations such as social occasions (situational disinhibition) was not associated with weight gain. Flexible control of dietary restraint attenuated the influence of habitual disinhibition in particular on weight gain and BMI, and was less effective in attenuating associations of emotional or situational disinhibition.

Discussion: Lifestyle modification programs for prevention and treatment of adult-onset obesity currently focus on reducing situational and emotional overeating; the results of this study suggest that a stronger emphasis on strategies that target habitual overeating may be warranted.

Figure 1

Predicted weight change calculated using the adjusted linear regression model. Calculations were completed using either 10th percentile (low) or 90th percentile (high) scores on flexible restraint (FR), habitual disinhibition (HD), and emotional disinhibition (ED) subscales, and sample means for all remaining model parameters.

Figure 2

Predicted BMI calculated using the adjusted linear regression model. Calculations were completed using either 10th percentile (low) or 90th percentile (high) scores on flexible restraint (FR), habitual disinhibition (HD), situational disinhibition (SD), and emotional disinhibition (ED) subscales, and sample means for all remaining model parameters.