Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;32(6):971-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9404-9.

Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs

J M C Maessen  1 , C H C Dejong, A G H Kessels, M F von Meyenfeldt; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group
Affiliations

Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs

J M C Maessen et al. World J Surg. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are designed to reduce hospital length of stay by shortening the postoperative recovery period. The intended effect of an accelerated recovery on the length of stay may be frustrated by a delayed discharge. This study was designed to assess the influence of an ERAS program on the proportion, appropriateness, and extent of delay in discharge.

Methods: Patients who enrolled in the ERAS program (n = 121) between 2003 and 2006 were compared with 52 patients who were managed traditionally in 2001.

Results: Ninety percent of the pre-ERAS patients and 87% of the ERAS patients were not discharged on the day that discharge criteria were fulfilled. The additional stay of 59% of the pre-ERAS patients and 69% of the ERAS patients was inappropriate. Wound care (15% in the pre-ERAS and 3% of the ERAS group) and observation of any symptoms pointing to an anastomotic leakage (10% in both groups) were the most important reasons for a medical appropriate delay of discharge. The extent of delay in discharge decreased significantly from a median of two days in the pre-ERAS group to a median of 1 day in the ERAS group (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Reductions in length of stay up to a median of 2 days after start of an enhanced recovery program may relate to changes in organization of care and not to a shorter recovery period. Recovery statistics should replace or at least be added to the length of stay as outcome of enhanced recovery programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Health Do (2002) NHS perfomance indicators. London: Department of health
    1. Shepperd S, Parkes J, McClaran J, Philips C (2006) Discharge planning from hospital to home (review). The Cochrane Library - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1191/026921599670206925', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1191/026921599670206925'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10348389', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10348389/'}]}
    2. Patterson CJ, Mulley GP (1999) The effectiveness of predischarge home assessment visits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 13:101–104 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1093/ageing/29.3.271', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/29.3.271'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10855913', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10855913/'}]}
    2. Hyde CJ, Robert IE, Sinclair AJ (2000) The effects of supporting discharge from hospital to home in older people. Age Ageing 29:271–279 - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03771.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03771.x'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16553673', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16553673/'}]}
    2. Efraimsson E, Sandman PO, Hyden LC, Holritz Rasmussen B (2006) How to get one’s voice heard: the problems of the discharge planning conference. J Adv Nurs 53:646–655 - PubMed