Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jun;17(6):822-5.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0610-4. Epub 2008 Jan 29.

Lumbar fusion outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

Lumbar fusion outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Charles H Crawford 3rd et al. Eur Spine J. 2008 Jun.

Abstract

Although outcomes after cervical fusion in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are widely published, outcomes of lumbar fusion in RA patients has not been reported. Nineteen patients with RA, identified using ICD-9 and CPT codes, who underwent instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion were matched for age, gender, smoking status, date, and level of surgery to a contemporaneous non-RA group. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed by the primary author who had no role in the treatment of these patients. The average age was 64 years in the RA group and 65 years in the non-RA group. The male to female ratio was 2:17 and 1:18, respectively. There were three smokers and two diabetics in each group. An average of 1.5 levels was fused in each group. Average follow-up was 24 and 27 months, respectively. In the RA group, 15 patients were taking DMARDs with 7 of those also taking oral steroids; 4 patients were taking NSAIDs only. There were seven complications (37%) in the RA group versus four (21%) in the non-RA group; wound infections in three patients (16%) in the RA group versus one (5%) in the non-RA group; and non-union in two patients (11%) in the RA group versus three (16%) in the non-RA group. Clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups with 74% of patients achieving good to excellent results in the RA group compared to 63% in the non-RA group (p = 0.692). Surgeons and their RA patients who undergo an instrumented lumbar fusion can expect a slightly higher complication rate than patients without RA which may be related to osteopenia and immunosuppression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Carreon LY, Djurasovic M, Sailer P, Glassman SD. Reliability and accuracy of fine-cut CT scans with reconstruction to evaluate status of posterolateral fusions with surgical exploration as the reference standard. Spine. 2007;32(8):892–895. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259808.47104.dd. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Helliwell PS, Zebouni LNP, Porter G, Wright V. A clinical and radiographical study of back pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1993;32:216–221. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/32.3.216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolithesis with spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(6):802–808. - PubMed
    1. Heywood AWB, Meyers OL. Rheumatoid arthritis of the thoracic and lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:362–368. - PubMed
    1. Inaoka M, Tada K, Yonenobu K. Problems of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for the rheumatoid spondylitis of the lumbar spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122:73–79. doi: 10.1007/s004020100321. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances