Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Jan 29:7:5.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-7-5.

To treat or not to treat: comparison of different criteria used to determine whether weight loss is to be recommended

Affiliations
Comparative Study

To treat or not to treat: comparison of different criteria used to determine whether weight loss is to be recommended

Ottavia Colombo et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Excess body fat is a major risk factor for disease primarily due to its endocrine activity. In recent years several criteria have been introduced to evaluate this factor. Nevertheless, treatment need is currently assessed only on the basis of an individual's Body Mass Index (BMI), calculated as body weight (in kg) divided by height in m2. The aim of our study was to determine whether application of the BMI, compared to adiposity-based criteria, results in underestimation of the number of subjects needing lifestyle intervention.

Methods: We compared treatment need based on BMI classification with four adiposity-based criteria: percentage body fat (%BF), considered both alone and in relation to metabolic syndrome risk (MS), waist circumference (WC), as an index of abdominal fat, and Body Fat Mass Index (BFMI, calculated as fat mass in kg divided by height in m2) in 63 volunteers (23 men and 40 women, aged 20 - 65 years).

Results: According to the classification based on BMI, 6.3% of subjects were underweight, 52.4% were normal weight, 30.2% were overweight, and 11.1% were obese. Agreement between the BMI categories and the other classification criteria categories varied; the most notable discrepancy emerged in the underweight and overweight categories. BMI compared to almost all of the other adiposity-based criteria, identified a lower percentage of subjects for whom treatment would be recommended. In particular, the proportion of subjects for whom clinicians would strongly recommend weight loss on the basis of their BMI (11.1%) was significantly lower than those identified according to WC (25.4%, p = 0.004), %BF (28.6%, p = 0.003), and MS (33.9%, p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The use of the BMI alone, as opposed to an assessment based on body composition, to identify individuals needing lifestyle intervention may lead to unfortunate misclassifications. Population-specific data on the relationships between body composition, morbidity, and mortality are needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of at-risk individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Weight loss treatment recommendations for each criterion. Percentage of subjects for whom weight loss would be recommended, including those for whom it would be strongly recommended, on the basis of the different criteria: BMI (Body Mass Index), WC (waist circumference, as an index of abdominal fat), %BF (total body fat, expressed as percentage body fat), MS (metabolic syndrome risk: %BF related to the risk of developing metabolic syndrome), BFMI (Body Fat Mass Index)

References

    1. World Health Organization . Report of a WHO consultation on Obesity WHO Technical Report Series No 894. WHO: Geneva; 1998. Obesity preventing and managing the global epidemic. - PubMed
    1. Overweight, Obesity and Health Risk. National Task Force on the Prevention and Treatment of Obesity. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:898–904. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.7.898. Review. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Willett W, Dietz WH, Colditz GA. Guidelines for healthy weight. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:427–434. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410607. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vigneri P, Frasca F, Sciacca L, Frittitta L, Vigneri R. Obesity and cancer. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2005.10.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonsson S, Hedblad B, Engstrom G, Nilsson P, Berglund G, Janzon L. Influence of obesity and cardiovascular risk. Twenty-three-year follow-up of 22,025 men from an urban Swedish population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:1046–1053. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802060. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types