Syntactic complexity during conversation of boys with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome
- PMID: 18230852
- DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/001)
Syntactic complexity during conversation of boys with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared the syntax of boys who have fragile X syndrome (FXS) with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with that of (a) boys who have Down syndrome (DS) and (b) typically developing (TD) boys.
Method: Thirty-five boys with FXS only, 36 boys with FXS with ASD, 31 boys with DS, and 46 TD boys participated. Conversational language samples were evaluated for utterance length and syntactic complexity (i.e., Index of Productive Syntax; H. S. Scarborough, 1990).
Results: After controlling for nonverbal mental age and maternal education levels, the 2 FXS groups did not differ in utterance length or syntactic complexity. The FXS groups and the DS group produced shorter, less complex utterances overall and less complex noun phrases, verb phrases, and sentence structures than did the TD boys. The FXS with ASD group and the DS group, but not the FXS-only group, produced less complex questions/negations than did the TD group. Compared with the DS group, both FXS groups produced longer, more complex utterances overall, but on the specific complexity measures, they scored higher only on questions/negations.
Conclusion: Boys with FXS and DS have distinctive language profiles. Although both groups demonstrated syntactic delays, boys with DS showed greater delays.
Similar articles
-
Language comprehension in boys with fragile X syndrome and boys with Down syndrome.J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007 Apr;51(Pt 4):318-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00881.x. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007. PMID: 17326813
-
Expressive language during conversational speech in boys with fragile X syndrome.Am J Ment Retard. 2007 Jan;112(1):1-17. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2007)112[1:ELDCSI]2.0.CO;2. Am J Ment Retard. 2007. PMID: 17181388
-
A comparison of oral structure and oral-motor function in young males with fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Aug;49(4):903-17. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/065). J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006. PMID: 16908884
-
Attention and language in fragile X.Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2004;10(1):11-6. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20003. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2004. PMID: 14994283 Review.
-
[Autism in fragile X syndrome].Rev Neurol. 2006 Feb 13;42 Suppl 2:S95-8. Rev Neurol. 2006. PMID: 16555225 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Dec;55(6):1600-12. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/10-0153). Epub 2012 Apr 3. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22473836 Free PMC article.
-
Discriminating Down Syndrome and Fragile X syndrome based on language ability.J Child Lang. 2013 Jan;40(1):244-65. doi: 10.1017/S0305000912000207. J Child Lang. 2013. PMID: 23217297 Free PMC article.
-
Longitudinal profiles of expressive vocabulary, syntax and pragmatic language in boys with fragile X syndrome or Down syndrome.Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 Jul-Aug;48(4):432-43. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12019. Epub 2013 Apr 19. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013. PMID: 23889838 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of autism spectrum disorder symptoms on gesture use in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2017 Jan-Dec;2:10.1177/2396941517745673. doi: 10.1177/2396941517745673. Epub 2017 Dec 25. Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2017. PMID: 30345371 Free PMC article.
-
How do students with intellectual disabilities tell stories? An investigation of narrative macrostructure and microstructure.J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Sep;35(5):1119-1130. doi: 10.1111/jar.12997. Epub 2022 Apr 15. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022. PMID: 35428038 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical