Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2008 Feb;49(2):227-36.
doi: 10.1080/10428190701769665.

Economic evaluation of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone for advanced follicular lymphoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Economic evaluation of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone for advanced follicular lymphoma

John Hornberger et al. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

The addition of rituximab to cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisolone (CVP) for advanced follicular lymphoma increases median time to progression by 17 months. A US societal cost-effectiveness of R-CVP versus CVP is estimated for a representative 50-year-old patient. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival are based on a randomized Phase III trial. Costs are estimated using Medicare reimbursement rates and published drug price data, and include drug and administration costs, adverse events, treatment of relapses, and end-of-life care. Utility estimates are derived from the literature and a 3% discount rate is employed. Mean overall survival is projected to be 1.51 years longer for patients assigned to R-CVP versus CVP. The cost per quality-adjusted year of life gained is $28,565. The utility associated with stable or progressive disease and the unit drug cost of rituximab most influence the findings. The cost-effectiveness ratio of R-CVP compared with CVP is projected to be cost-effective in the United States under a range of sensitivity analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
First-line R-CVP First R versus CVP.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Observed survival based on the trial data and then predicted using hazard ratios. (b) Observed progression-free survival and then predicted using hazard ratios.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Quality of the evidence − grading system.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sensitivity analyses.

References

    1. Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Classification Project. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2780–2795. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher C, Gregory W, Jones A, Stansfeld A, Richards M, Dhaliwal H, et al. Follicular lymphoma: prognostic factors for response and survival. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:1470–1480. - PubMed
    1. Horning S. Natural history of and therapy for the indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Semin Oncol. 1993;20:75–88. - PubMed
    1. Rohatiner A, Lister T. The clinical course of follicular lymphoma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2005;18:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Solal-Celigny P, Roy P, Colombat P, White J, Armitage J, Arranz-Saez R, et al. Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood. 2004;104:1258–1265. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources