Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan 30:9:58.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-58.

Insights into the Musa genome: syntenic relationships to rice and between Musa species

Affiliations

Insights into the Musa genome: syntenic relationships to rice and between Musa species

Magali Lescot et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

Background: Musa species (Zingiberaceae, Zingiberales) including bananas and plantains are collectively the fourth most important crop in developing countries. Knowledge concerning Musa genome structure and the origin of distinct cultivars has greatly increased over the last few years. Until now, however, no large-scale analyses of Musa genomic sequence have been conducted. This study compares genomic sequence in two Musa species with orthologous regions in the rice genome.

Results: We produced 1.4 Mb of Musa sequence from 13 BAC clones, annotated and analyzed them along with 4 previously sequenced BACs. The 443 predicted genes revealed that Zingiberales genes share GC content and distribution characteristics with eudicot and Poaceae genomes. Comparison with rice revealed microsynteny regions that have persisted since the divergence of the Commelinid orders Poales and Zingiberales at least 117 Mya. The previously hypothesized large-scale duplication event in the common ancestor of major cereal lineages within the Poaceae was verified. The divergence time distributions for Musa-Zingiber (Zingiberaceae, Zingiberales) orthologs and paralogs provide strong evidence for a large-scale duplication event in the Musa lineage after its divergence from the Zingiberaceae approximately 61 Mya. Comparisons of genomic regions from M. acuminata and M. balbisiana revealed highly conserved genome structure, and indicated that these genomes diverged circa 4.6 Mya.

Conclusion: These results point to the utility of comparative analyses between distantly-related monocot species such as rice and Musa for improving our understanding of monocot genome evolution. Sequencing the genome of M. acuminata would provide a strong foundation for comparative genomics in the monocots. In addition a genome sequence would aid genomic and genetic analyses of cultivated Musa polyploid genotypes in research aimed at localizing and cloning genes controlling important agronomic traits for breeding purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Current understanding of relationships among monocot orders [118]. Families are shown in bold caps and genera with EST sequences in dbEST [119]. The number of sequences in GenBank (as of 10/08/07) are shown in parentheses for each order and the shaded box highlights Commelinid orders. The nodes with < 75% bootstrap support are grey.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Chromosome preparations of M. acuminata cv. Calcutta-4 (2n = 22) stained with DAPI after FISH of BAC. (A) MA4_78I12 (detected with Texas red). (B) MA4_54N07 (detected FITC). Scale bar = 10 microns.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of GC content in Musa and its comparison with other plant species. (A) All TCs/ESTs from the named species. (B) All annotated CDS from 17 Musa BACs (this data set) and the complete genomes of Arabidopsis and rice.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean GC content from 5' to 3' across 129 bp sliding windows. (A) for 77 Musa genes with a "rice-like" gradient. (B) for 180 Musa genes with an "Aradidopsis-like" pattern
Figure 5
Figure 5
Musa-rice syntenic regions. Predicted genes and their orientation are shown as boxed areas. Genes annotated such as hypothetical genes are represented in white. The probes used to identify the Musa BAC clones are indicated in brackets. Conserved genes between Musa and rice regions are connected by shaded areas. (A) Syntenic relationship between Musa MBP_91N22 BAC clone and rice chromosome 1. (B) Syntenic relationship between Musa MA4_25J11 BAC clone and rice chromosome 1 and 5. The numbers above the genes correspond to the locus numbers used for phylogenetic analyses. (C) Syntenic relationship between Musa MA4_8L21 BAC clone and rice chromosome 3.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Phylogenetic analyses on three of the ten M. acuminata genes from MA4_25J11 BAC clone. These three Musa genes have homologous genes in rice chromosomes 1 and 5 and the locus numbers are taken from Figure 5B. Stars indicate duplication events in the most recent common ancestor of major grain lineages (i.e. rice, wheat and maize). MA4_25J11 BAC clone was isolated by the SbRPG132 probe.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison between M. acuminata MA4_82I11 BAC clone and M. balbisiana MBP_81C12 BAC clone. Predicted genes and their orientation are shown as boxed areas. Genes annotated such as hypothetical genes are represented in white. The probe used to identify the Musa BAC clones is indicated in brackets. Conserved genes between the two Musa regions are connected by shaded areas. (A) Dot plot analysis of the two pairs of homeologous BACs from M. acuminata and M. balbisiana.(B) Diagram of the syntenic regions between the two BAC clones.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Frequency of synonymous substitution (Ks) in different pairwise species comparisons. These results reveal the existence of whole genome duplications within Musa and revealed an extensive event pre-dating the ginger-Musa or rice-Musa divergences.

Similar articles

  • Integrated syntenic and phylogenomic analyses reveal an ancient genome duplication in monocots.
    Jiao Y, Li J, Tang H, Paterson AH. Jiao Y, et al. Plant Cell. 2014 Jul;26(7):2792-802. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.127597. Epub 2014 Jul 31. Plant Cell. 2014. PMID: 25082857 Free PMC article.
  • A BAC end view of the Musa acuminata genome.
    Cheung F, Town CD. Cheung F, et al. BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Jun 11;7:29. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-29. BMC Plant Biol. 2007. PMID: 17562019 Free PMC article.
  • The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants.
    D'Hont A, Denoeud F, Aury JM, Baurens FC, Carreel F, Garsmeur O, Noel B, Bocs S, Droc G, Rouard M, Da Silva C, Jabbari K, Cardi C, Poulain J, Souquet M, Labadie K, Jourda C, Lengellé J, Rodier-Goud M, Alberti A, Bernard M, Correa M, Ayyampalayam S, Mckain MR, Leebens-Mack J, Burgess D, Freeling M, Mbéguié-A-Mbéguié D, Chabannes M, Wicker T, Panaud O, Barbosa J, Hribova E, Heslop-Harrison P, Habas R, Rivallan R, Francois P, Poiron C, Kilian A, Burthia D, Jenny C, Bakry F, Brown S, Guignon V, Kema G, Dita M, Waalwijk C, Joseph S, Dievart A, Jaillon O, Leclercq J, Argout X, Lyons E, Almeida A, Jeridi M, Dolezel J, Roux N, Risterucci AM, Weissenbach J, Ruiz M, Glaszmann JC, Quétier F, Yahiaoui N, Wincker P. D'Hont A, et al. Nature. 2012 Aug 9;488(7410):213-7. doi: 10.1038/nature11241. Nature. 2012. PMID: 22801500
  • Exploring the genomes: from Arabidopsis to crops.
    Spannagl M, Mayer K, Durner J, Haberer G, Fröhlich A. Spannagl M, et al. J Plant Physiol. 2011 Jan 1;168(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.07.008. J Plant Physiol. 2011. PMID: 20817312 Review.
  • Codon usage and codon pair patterns in non-grass monocot genomes.
    Mazumdar P, Binti Othman R, Mebus K, Ramakrishnan N, Ann Harikrishna J. Mazumdar P, et al. Ann Bot. 2017 Nov 28;120(6):893-909. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx112. Ann Bot. 2017. PMID: 29155926 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Arias P, Dankers C, Liu P, Pilkauskas P. The world banana economy 1985–2002. FAO. 2003. http://www.fao.org/documents/show_cdr.asp?url_file=/docrep/007/y5102e/y5...
    1. Janssen T, Bremer K. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800 + rbcL sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;146:385–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00345.x. - DOI
    1. Sanderson MJ, Thorne JL, Wikström N, Bremer K. Molecular evidence on plant divergence times. American Journal of Botany. 2004;91 - PubMed
    1. Simmonds N, Shepherd K. The taxonomy and origins of the cultivated bananas. Bot J Linn Soc. 1955;55:302–312.
    1. Bartos J, Alkhimova O, Dolezelova M, De Langhe E, Dolezel J. Nuclear genome size and genomic distribution of ribosomal DNA in Musa and Ensete (Musaceae): taxonomic implications. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;109:50–57. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources