Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;6(2):68-74.

The vision of recovery today: what it is and what it means for services

Affiliations

The vision of recovery today: what it is and what it means for services

Marianne Farkas. World Psychiatry. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

In the past, practice in mental health was guided by the belief that individuals with serious mental illnesses do not recover. The course of their illness was either seen pessimistically, as deteriorative, or optimistically, as a maintenance course. Research over the past thirty to forty years has indicted that belief and shown that a vision of recovery can be achieved for many individuals. People with serious mental illnesses have themselves published accounts of their own recovery as well as advocated for the development of recovery promoting services. In North America and other regions, policies have been developed to make recovery the guiding vision of services. Today, particularly in the United States, much effort is going into the transformation of services and systems to achieve recovery outcomes. Despite these trends, the idea of recovery remains controversial and, some say, even illusory. This article clarifies the meaning of the term "recovery", reviews the research and first person accounts providing a rationale for recovery, and sets out implications for developing recovery oriented services.

Keywords: Recovery; recovery oriented services; recovery research; serious mental illnesses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. DeSisto MJ. Harding CM. McCormick RV, et al. The Maine and Vermont three-decade studies of serious mental illness: I. Matched comparisons of cross-sectional outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;167:331–338. - PubMed
    1. Harding CM. Brooks GW. Ashikaga T, et al. The Vermont longitudinal study of persons with severe mental illness: II. Long-term outcome of subjects who retrospectively met DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1987;144:727–735. - PubMed
    1. Sartorius N. Gulbinat W. Harrison G, et al. Long-term follow-up of schizophrenia in 16 countries: a description of the International Study of Schizophrenia conducted by the World Health Organization. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996;31:249–258. - PubMed
    1. Harding CM. Strauss JS. How serious is schizophrenia? Comments on prognosis. Biol Psychiatry. 1984;19:1597–1600. - PubMed
    1. Harding CM. Zahniser J. Empirical correction of seven myths about schizophrenia with implications for treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994;90(Suppl. 384):140–146. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources