Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer
- PMID: 18236129
- DOI: 10.1007/s11604-007-0187-6
Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-tesla diffusion-weighted imaging in the visibility of breast cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) at 3.0 T and 1.5 T by evaluating the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and visibility of breast cancer in the same patients.
Materials and methods: A total of 13 patients (16 lesions) with breast cancer underwent DWI at 3.0 T and 1.5 T. Tumors were classified into two groups based on the lesion size. The ADC values were measured, and visibility of the tumors was scored blindly.
Results: No significant difference was found for ADC values between 3.0 T and 1.5 T in either group (P > 0.05). All of the large lesions were visible clearly at both magnetic field strengths, and image scores were not different (P > 0.05). In contrast, small lesions were more clearly visible and had better image scores at 3.0 T than at 1.5 T (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Small cancers were more clearly visible on DWI at 3.0 T than 1.5 T.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of tumor morphology on diffusion-weighted (DWI) breast MRI: Diagnostic value of reduced field of view DWI.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec;42(6):1656-65. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24929. Epub 2015 Apr 24. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25914178 Free PMC article.
-
Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e782-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 13. Eur J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24034833 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.Eur J Radiol. 2013 Dec;82(12):e801-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13. Eur J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 24099642
-
Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience.Radiol Med. 2015 Aug;120(8):705-13. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0508-2. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Radiol Med. 2015. PMID: 25665796
-
3-T breast diffusion-weighted MRI by echo-planar imaging with spectral spatial excitation or with additional spectral inversion recovery: an in vivo comparison of image quality.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 May-Jun;39(3):343-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000223. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015. PMID: 25695868 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Conspicuity of breast lesions at different b values on diffusion-weighted imaging.BMC Cancer. 2012 Aug 2;12:334. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-334. BMC Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22853049 Free PMC article.
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.Br J Radiol. 2014 Jul;87(1039):20130807. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130807. Epub 2014 May 16. Br J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24834475 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative axillary staging with 3.0-T breast MRI: clinical value of diffusion imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 30;10(3):e0122516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122516. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25823016 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21(9):2011-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2140-4. Epub 2011 May 12. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21562806
-
Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.Eur Radiol. 2012 Jul;22(7):1519-28. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2403-8. Epub 2012 Mar 13. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22411304
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical