Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population
- PMID: 18237377
- PMCID: PMC2270862
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-2
Towards socially inclusive research: an evaluation of telephone questionnaire administration in a multilingual population
Abstract
Background: Missing data may bias the results of clinical trials and other studies. This study describes the response rate, questionnaire responses and financial costs associated with offering participants from a multilingual population the option to complete questionnaires over the telephone.
Design: Before and after study of two methods of questionnaire completion.
Participants and setting: Seven hundred and sixty five pregnant women from 25 general practices in two UK inner city Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) taking part in a cluster randomised controlled trial of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care. Two hundred and four participants did not speak English. Sixty one women were offered postal questionnaire completion only and 714 women were offered a choice of telephone or postal questionnaire completion.
Outcome measures: (i) Proportion of completed questionnaires, (ii) attitude and knowledge responses obtained from a questionnaire assessing informed choice.
Results: The response rate from women offered postal completion was 26% compared with 67% for women offered a choice of telephone or postal completion (41% difference 95% CI Diff 30 to 52). For non-English speakers offered a choice of completion methods the response rate was 56% compared with 71% for English speakers (95% CI Diff 7 to 23). No difference was found for knowledge by completion method, but telephone completion was associated with more positive attitude classifications than postal completion (87 vs 96%, 95% CI diff 0.006 to 15). Compared with postal administration the additional costs associated with telephone administration were pound3.90 per questionnaire for English speakers and pound71.60 per questionnaire for non English speakers.
Conclusion: Studies requiring data to be collected by questionnaire may obtain higher response rates from both English and non-English speakers when a choice of telephone or postal administration (and where necessary, an interpreter)is offered compared to offering postal administration only. This approach will, however, incur additional research costs and uncertainty remains about the equivalence of responses obtained from the two methods.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact on informed choice of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care: a randomized trial.J Med Screen. 2011;18(2):65-75. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.010132. J Med Screen. 2011. PMID: 21852698 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Antenatal screening for haemoglobinopathies in primary care: a cohort study and cluster randomised trial to inform a simulation model. The Screening for Haemoglobinopathies in First Trimester (SHIFT) trial.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Apr;14(20):1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta14200. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 20416236 Clinical Trial.
-
Development of a measure of informed choice suitable for use in low literacy populations.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jun;66(3):278-95. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 14. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17300913
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Response is increased using postal rather than electronic questionnaires - new results from an updated Cochrane Systematic Review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02332-0. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39285263 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Attitudinal and demographic predictors of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) uptake during the UK catch-up campaign 2008-09: cross-sectional survey.PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019381. Epub 2011 May 13. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21602931 Free PMC article.
-
Maximising recruitment and retention of general practices in clinical trials: a case study.Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Nov;58(556):759-66, i-ii. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X319666. Br J Gen Pract. 2008. PMID: 19000399 Free PMC article.
-
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 29;9(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01471-x. Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32993797 Free PMC article.
-
Impact on informed choice of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care: a randomized trial.J Med Screen. 2011;18(2):65-75. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.010132. J Med Screen. 2011. PMID: 21852698 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Mangione TW. Mail Surveys: improving the quality. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1995.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources