Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Jan 31:9:10.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-9-10.

Measuring the financial burden of acute cough in pre-school children: a cost of illness study

Affiliations

Measuring the financial burden of acute cough in pre-school children: a cost of illness study

Sandra Hollinghurst et al. BMC Fam Pract. .

Abstract

Context: Acute cough is a very common symptom presentation among children in primary care and is usually due to respiratory infection, yet its cost is unknown. An estimate of the cost to healthcare providers and parents would aid budgetary decision-making, and provide an insight into the need for interventions to reduce the burden.

Purpose: To estimate the cost per child per episode, and the annual population cost in the UK, of acute cough in pre-school children presenting to primary care.

Design: Incidence and prevalence-based cost-of-illness study from the perspectives of the UK NHS and of parents and caregivers.

Setting: 11 general practices in Bristol, UK.

Subjects: 121 children without known asthma aged 3 to 59 months presenting for the first time with an acute (</= 28 days) cough.

Results: Mean cost per episode to the NHS: pound27.43 (95% CI: pound24.38 - pound30.49). Mean cost per episode to parents and carers: pound14.77 ( pound4.90 - pound24.65). Annual cost to the NHS in the UK: at least pound31.5 m (95% CI: pound28.0 m - pound35.0 m).

Conclusion: The cost burden on the healthcare provider of acute cough in pre-school children is substantial; the majority of this cost arises from consultations with general practitioners. Parents experience some personal cost through travel and expenditure on over-the-counter preparations, and may suffer significantly if loss of earnings is experienced. There is scope for evaluating interventions designed to reduce this burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. McCormick A, Fleming D, Carlton J. Morbidity statistics from general practice Fourth national study 1991–1992. London: HMSO; 2006.
    1. Monto AS, Cavallaro JJ, Monto AS, Cavallaro JJ. The Tecumseh study of respiratory illness. II. Patterns of occurrence of infection with respiratory pathogens, 1965–1969. Am J Epidemiol. 1971;94:280–289. - PubMed
    1. Ehlken B, Ihorst G, Lippert B, Rohwedder A, Petersen G, Schmacher M, Forster J. Economic impact of community-acquired and nosocomial lower respiratory tract infections in young children in Germany. Eur J Pediatr. 2005;164:607–615. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1705-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambert S, O'Grady KA, Gabriel S, Carter R, Nolan T. The cost of seasonal respiratory illnesses in Australian children: the dominance of patient and family costs and implications for vaccine use. Commun Dis Intell. 2004;28:510–516. - PubMed
    1. Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, Sarnes M. The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:487–494. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.4.487. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms