Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Feb;57(2):189-95.
doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1299-1.

[Scoring systems for daily assessment in intensive care medicine. Overview, current possibilities and demands on new developments]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[Scoring systems for daily assessment in intensive care medicine. Overview, current possibilities and demands on new developments]

[Article in German]
F Brenck et al. Anaesthesist. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Scoring systems are a fixed element of modern diagnostics and are integrated in the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) billing system as well as quality assurance projects. The ongoing developments require classification according to the terms of use in order to maintain an overview of the numerous systems available. In the area of intensive care medicine scoring systems can be divided into admission scores and progress scores, whereby the scores for daily assessment can be further subdivided into five categories, depending on the target criteria: objective description of the grade of organ dysfunction, progression in intensive care therapy, evaluation of the degree of nursing care, determination of outcome/mortality risk, and grouping of patient collectives for clinical trials. In future developments it will be necessary to generate new strategies to adequately describe the progress of a patient. Not only will mortality be challenged as a target criterion but also the handling of missing data and the simplification of reality by categorization practised so far that can be found in all established scoring systems as far as calculation of predictive values regarding a defined result.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • [Intensive care of patients with [infarct-related] cardiogenic shock : Abridged version of the S1 guideline].
    Hermes C, Ochmann T; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internistische Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DGIIN); Keienburg C; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Fachkrankenpflege und Funktionsdienste e. V. (DGF); Kegel M; Deutsche Gesellschaft Interdisziplinäre Notfall- und Akutmedizin e. V. (DGINA); Schindele D; Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin e. V. (DIVI); Klausmeier J; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kardiologie – Herz- und Kreislaufforschung e. V. (DGK); Adrigan E; Österreichische Gesellschaft für Internistische und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin e. V. (ÖGIAIN). Hermes C, et al. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Sep;117(Suppl 2):25-36. doi: 10.1007/s00063-022-00945-1. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022. PMID: 36040499 Free PMC article. Review. German.
  • [Scoring systems in intensive care medicine : principles, models, application and limits].
    Fleig V, Brenck F, Wolff M, Weigand MA. Fleig V, et al. Anaesthesist. 2011 Oct;60(10):963-74. doi: 10.1007/s00101-011-1942-8. Anaesthesist. 2011. PMID: 21997474 Review. German.

References

    1. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81-4 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1345-55 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 1995 May;66(5):513-8 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2000 Jan;26(1):57-61 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources