Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Feb;21(2):101-4.
doi: 10.1080/14767050701836792.

A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability

Adam J Wolfberg et al. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a computerized algorithm to quantify fetal heart rate (FHR) variability and compare it to perinatologists' interpretation of FHR variability.

Methods: FHR variability was calculated using data from 30 women who had a fetal scalp electrode placed for a clinical indication, and compared to the assessment of FHR variability from four perinatologists who interpreted paper tracings of the same data. Inter-rater reliability was calculated and receiver-operator curve analysis was done.

Results: Correlation between the computer algorithm's assessment of variability and the perinatologists' assessment (0.27-0.68) was similar to the inter-rater reliability between perinatologists (0.33-0.72).

Conclusions: A computer-based algorithm can assess FHR variability as well as expert clinicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample fetal heart rate tracing scored by expert perinatologists.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Receiver–operator characteristic analysis of fetal heart rate variability to distinguish minimal from moderate variability.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murray DR. What is ‘heart rate variability’ and is it blunted by tumor necrosis factor? Chest. 2003;123:664–667. - PubMed
    1. Levy MN. Sympathetic–parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res. 1971;29:437–445. - PubMed
    1. Chess GF, Tam RM, Calaresu FR. Influence of cardiac neural inputs on rhythmic variations of heart period in the cat. Am J Physiol. 1975;228:775–780. - PubMed
    1. Schwartz PJ, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Brown AM. A cardiocardiac sympathovagal reflex in the cat. Circ Res. 1973;32:215–220. - PubMed
    1. Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991;84:482–492. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources