A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability
- PMID: 18240077
- PMCID: PMC4121657
- DOI: 10.1080/14767050701836792
A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a computerized algorithm to quantify fetal heart rate (FHR) variability and compare it to perinatologists' interpretation of FHR variability.
Methods: FHR variability was calculated using data from 30 women who had a fetal scalp electrode placed for a clinical indication, and compared to the assessment of FHR variability from four perinatologists who interpreted paper tracings of the same data. Inter-rater reliability was calculated and receiver-operator curve analysis was done.
Results: Correlation between the computer algorithm's assessment of variability and the perinatologists' assessment (0.27-0.68) was similar to the inter-rater reliability between perinatologists (0.33-0.72).
Conclusions: A computer-based algorithm can assess FHR variability as well as expert clinicians.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Application of fuzzy inference systems for classification of fetal heart rate tracings in relation to neonatal outcome.Ginekol Pol. 2013 Jan;84(1):38-43. doi: 10.17772/gp/1538. Ginekol Pol. 2013. PMID: 23488308
-
Analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracing by physician and computer.J Matern Fetal Med. 2000 May-Jun;9(3):181-5. doi: 10.1002/1520-6661(200005/06)9:3<181::AID-MFM7>3.0.CO;2-C. J Matern Fetal Med. 2000. PMID: 10914628
-
Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019 Jul;300(1):7-14. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05151-7. Epub 2019 May 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019. PMID: 31053949
-
Measurement of fetal heart rate variability on an electronic monitor using a prototype electronic ruler.Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):409-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304820. Epub 2012 Mar 7. Am J Perinatol. 2012. PMID: 22399221
-
Fetal heart rate monitoring: interpretation and collaborative management.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000 Nov-Dec;45(6):498-507. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(00)00069-6. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000. PMID: 11151463 Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability and agreement in intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring interpretation: A systematic review.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Aug;102(8):970-985. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14591. Epub 2023 Jun 13. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 37310765 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in heart rate variability in a premature infant with hydrocephalus.AJP Rep. 2012 Nov;2(1):43-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1316462. Epub 2012 Jun 27. AJP Rep. 2012. PMID: 23946905 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Murray DR. What is ‘heart rate variability’ and is it blunted by tumor necrosis factor? Chest. 2003;123:664–667. - PubMed
-
- Levy MN. Sympathetic–parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res. 1971;29:437–445. - PubMed
-
- Chess GF, Tam RM, Calaresu FR. Influence of cardiac neural inputs on rhythmic variations of heart period in the cat. Am J Physiol. 1975;228:775–780. - PubMed
-
- Schwartz PJ, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Brown AM. A cardiocardiac sympathovagal reflex in the cat. Circ Res. 1973;32:215–220. - PubMed
-
- Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991;84:482–492. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources