A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability
- PMID: 18240077
- PMCID: PMC4121657
- DOI: 10.1080/14767050701836792
A comparison of subjective and mathematical estimations of fetal heart rate variability
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a computerized algorithm to quantify fetal heart rate (FHR) variability and compare it to perinatologists' interpretation of FHR variability.
Methods: FHR variability was calculated using data from 30 women who had a fetal scalp electrode placed for a clinical indication, and compared to the assessment of FHR variability from four perinatologists who interpreted paper tracings of the same data. Inter-rater reliability was calculated and receiver-operator curve analysis was done.
Results: Correlation between the computer algorithm's assessment of variability and the perinatologists' assessment (0.27-0.68) was similar to the inter-rater reliability between perinatologists (0.33-0.72).
Conclusions: A computer-based algorithm can assess FHR variability as well as expert clinicians.
Figures
References
-
- Murray DR. What is ‘heart rate variability’ and is it blunted by tumor necrosis factor? Chest. 2003;123:664–667. - PubMed
-
- Levy MN. Sympathetic–parasympathetic interactions in the heart. Circ Res. 1971;29:437–445. - PubMed
-
- Chess GF, Tam RM, Calaresu FR. Influence of cardiac neural inputs on rhythmic variations of heart period in the cat. Am J Physiol. 1975;228:775–780. - PubMed
-
- Schwartz PJ, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Malliani A, Brown AM. A cardiocardiac sympathovagal reflex in the cat. Circ Res. 1973;32:215–220. - PubMed
-
- Malliani A, Pagani M, Lombardi F, Cerutti S. Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain. Circulation. 1991;84:482–492. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources