Faculty teaching time: a comparison of web-based and face-to-face graduate nursing courses
- PMID: 18241197
- PMCID: PMC2920737
- DOI: 10.2202/1548-923X.1539
Faculty teaching time: a comparison of web-based and face-to-face graduate nursing courses
Abstract
Web-based education brings a new dimension to the issue of measuring faculty workload. Current literature reflects instructor concerns related to the time required to teach web-based courses (McAlpine, Lockerbie, Ramsay & Beaman 2002; Sellani & Harrington, 2002; Smith, Ferguson & Caris, 2001). This descriptive, comparative study seeks to determine the time required to teach web-based graduate nursing courses and compare that to teaching similar courses in the face-to-face setting. Utilizing time records previously collected as part of a federally funded grant, data from 11 web-based and five face-to-face graduate level nursing courses were analyzed. Although a statistically significant difference in teaching time requirements was not demonstrated, several interesting trends did appear. Examples include differences related to preparation time and the division of teacher time while teaching web-based as opposed to face-to-face courses. Future research and continued data collection related to faculty workload and time usage will be needed as web-based courses become a growing part of graduate nursing education.
Similar articles
-
Faculty perception of the effectiveness of EBP courses for graduate nursing students.Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Dec;11(6):401-13. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12068. Epub 2014 Sep 30. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014. PMID: 25270089
-
Teaching pharmacology to graduate nursing students: evaluation and comparison of Web-based and face-to-face methods.J Nurs Educ. 2004 Apr;43(4):185-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20040401-01. J Nurs Educ. 2004. PMID: 15098914
-
Integrating Web-based instruction into a graduate nursing program taught via videoconferencing. Challenges and solutions.Comput Nurs. 2000 Jan-Feb;18(1):26-34. Comput Nurs. 2000. PMID: 10673814
-
Web-based teaching in nursing: lessons from the literature.Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Aug;24(6):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.04.010. Nurse Educ Today. 2004. PMID: 15312954 Review.
-
Strategies to manage the time demands of online teaching.Nurse Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;31(6):270-4. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200611000-00012. Nurse Educ. 2006. PMID: 17108792 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the effect of web-based, simulation-based, and conventional training on the accuracy of visual estimation of postpartum hemorrhage volume on midwifery students: A randomized clinical trial.J Educ Health Promot. 2016 Jun 23;5:22. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.184548. eCollection 2016. J Educ Health Promot. 2016. PMID: 27500175 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Association of Colleges of Nursing 1999AACN white paper: Distance technology in nursing educationRetrieved February 10, 2005, from www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/positions/whitepaper.htm
-
- Avery M, Ringdahl D, Juve C, Plumbo P. The transition to web-based education: Enhancing access to graduate education for women's health providers. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health. 2003;48:418–425. - PubMed
-
- Baldwin KM, Walker C, Evans E. Educational innovations. increasing nursing faculty in rural Texas through online education. Journal of Nursing Education. 2004;43:555–557. - PubMed
-
- Billings DM. A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in web-based courses in nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 2000;39:60–67. - PubMed
-
- Buckley KM. Evaluation of classroom-based, web-enhanced, and web-based distance learning nutrition courses for undergraduate nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 2003;42:367–370. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources