Effect of timing of estradiol benzoate administration upon synchronization of ovulation in suckling Nelore cows (Bos indicus) treated with a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device

Abstract

The present study investigated how the timing of the administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) impacted the synchronization of ovulation in fixed-time artificial insemination protocols of cattle. To accomplish this, two experiments were conducted, with EB injection occurring at different times: at withdrawal of the progesterone-releasing (P4) intravaginal device or 24h later. The effectiveness of these times was compared by examining ovarian follicular dynamics (Experiment 1, n=30) and conception rates (Experiment 2, n=504). In Experiment 1, follicular dynamics was performed in 30 Nelore cows (Bos indicus) allocated into two groups. On a random day of the estrous cycle (Day 0), both groups received 2mg of EB i.m. and a P4-releasing intravaginal device, which was removed on Day 8, when 400 IU of eCG and 150 microg of PGF were administered. The control group (G-EB9; n=15) received 1mg of EB on Day 9, while Group EB8 (G-EB8; n=15) received the same dose a day earlier. Ovarian ultrasonographic evaluations were performed every 8h after device removal until ovulation. The timing of EB administration (Day 8 compared with Day 9) did affect the interval between P4 device removal to ovulation (59.4+/-2.0 h compared with 69.3+/-1.7h) and maximum diameter of dominant (1.54+/-0.06 acm compared with 1.71+/-0.05 bcm, P=0.03) and ovulatory (1.46+/-0.05 acm compared with 1.58+/-0.04 bcm, P<0.01) follicles. In Experiment 2, 504 suckling cows received the same treatment described in Experiment 1, but insemination was performed as follows: Group EB8-AI48 h (G-EB8-AI48 h; n=119) and Group EB8-AI54 h (G-EB8-AI54 h; n=134) received 1mg of EB on Day 8 and FTAI was performed, respectively, 48 or 54 h after P4 device removal. Group EB9-AI48h (G-EB9-AI48 h; n=126) and Group EB9-AI54 h (G-EB9-AI54 h; n=125) received the same treatments and underwent the same FTAI protocols as G-EB8-AI48 h and G-EB8-AI54 h, respectively; however, EB was administered on Day 9. Conception rates were greater (P<0.05) in G-EB9-AI54 h [63.2% (79/125) a], G-EB9-AI48 h [58.7% (74/126) a] and G-EB8-AI48 h [58.8% (70/119) a] than in G-EB8-AI54 h [34.3% (46/134) b]. We concluded that when EB administration occurred at device withdrawal (D8), the interval to ovulation shortened and dominant and ovulatory follicle diameters decreased. Furthermore, when EB treatment was performed 24h after device removal, FTAI conducted at either 48 or 54 h resulted in similar conception rates. However, EB treatment on the same day as device withdrawal resulted in a lesser conception rate when FTAI was conducted 54 h after device removal.