Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Mar;17(2):195-205.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9308-7. Epub 2008 Feb 2.

Effectiveness of health-related quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians

Jolie J Gutteling  1 , Anne-Sophie E Darlington, Harry L A Janssen, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Jan J V Busschbach, Robert A de Man
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of health-related quality-of-life measurement in clinical practice: a prospective, randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic liver disease and their physicians

Jolie J Gutteling et al. Qual Life Res. 2008 Mar.

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the effectiveness of computerized measurement and feedback of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in daily clinical practice in patients with chronic liver disease.

Methods: One hundred and sixty-two patients (61% men; mean age 47.5 years) regularly completed computerized HRQoL questionnaires before each consultation for the duration of 1 year. Six physicians were randomly assigned to the experimental group and received an instant online graphical output of data. Five other physicians were randomly assigned to the control group and conducted their consultations as usual. Differences between groups on generic- and disease-specific HRQoL, patient management, and patient satisfaction with the consultation were assessed, as were physicians' experiences with HRQoL data and effects on their consultations.

Results: No direct effect of the experimental condition on patients' HRQoL was found. However, an interaction effect of the experimental condition and age was found: older patients in the experimental group had significantly better disease-specific HRQoL (F = 4.16; P = 0.04) and generic mental HRQoL (F = 4.62; P = 0.03) than patients in the control group. Also, male patients in the experimental group had better generic mental HRQoL than patients in the control group (F = 6.10; P = 0.02). Physicians in the experimental group altered their treatment policy significantly more often than did physicians in the control group (z = -3.73, P = 0.00), and their experiences with the availability of HRQoL information were generally positive. The scores on patient satisfaction with the consultation did not differ significantly between the experimental and control groups (z = -1.20, P = 0.23).

Conclusions: Computerized measurement and feedback of HRQoL in a daily clinical practice of an outpatient department of hepatology did not improve HRQoL for the entire group of chronic liver patients but, rather, improved disease-specific HRQoL of older patients with chronic liver disease and mental HRQoL of older patients and male patients with chronic liver disease. It also had an effect on patient management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of the graphical output of patients’ health-related quality of life as presented to physicians in the intervention group. A score of 50 is the average score of a healthy norm population. The dashed line represents the mean score for patients with chronic liver disease
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patients in the study
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aaronson, N. K. (1988). Quality of life: What is it? How should it be measured? Oncology, 2(5), 69–76. - PubMed
    1. Passik, S. D., Dugan, W., McDonald, M. V., Rosenfeld, B., Theobald, D. E., & Edgerton S. (1998). Oncologists’ recognition of depression in their patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 16(4), 1594–1600. - PubMed
    1. Detmar, S. B., Aaronson, N. K., Wever, L. D., Muller, M., & Schornagel, J. H. (2000). How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients’ and oncologists’ preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life issues. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(18), 3295–3301. - PubMed
    1. Laine, C., Davidoff, F., Lewis, C. E., et al. (1996). Important elements of outpatient care: A comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 125(8), 640–645. - PubMed
    1. Schor, E. L., Lerner, D. J., & Malspeis, S. (1995). Physicians’ assessment of functional health status and well-being. The patient’s perspective. Archives of Internal Medicine, 155(3), 309–314. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types