[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability]
- PMID: 18247269
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985168
[Use of the WHODAS II with stroke patients and their relatives: reliability and inter-rater-reliability]
Abstract
The WHODAS II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II) is a questionnaire derived from the ICF classification system (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health) for the evaluation of disabilities and handicaps. Data on its validity and reliability with respect to the consequences of stroke are largely lacking. The present study aimed at measurements of reliability of the WHODAS II in its application to stroke patients and their closest others. Eighty-four patient-relative pairs were assessed six months after stroke with the self- and observer-rating versions. From the patients' and relatives' judgements, Cronbach's alpha was computed as measurement of internal consistency, intra-class correlation coefficients as measurements of the inter-rater reliability of subscales and total scores, and Spearman's rho (rho) for the inter-rater reliability for single items. In addition, the inter-rater correspondence was calculated as the percentage of responses. The internal consistency was found to be good to excellent (alpha=0.81-0.99) both for patients' and relatives' judgements. Inter-rater reliabilities ranged from satisfactory for the subscale Understanding and Communication to excellent for the total score (ICC 0.64-0.94). However, the inter-rater reliability of the items as well as their percental correspondence was hardly satisfactory, with few exceptions in the realms of Life Activities and Self-Care (rho=0.24-0.90 and percental correspondence 29.6%-75.7%). Our results demonstrate that the WHODAS II is a reliable instrument for the assessment of stroke patients, both as a self- and an observer-rating questionnaire. Whereas the correspondence between patient and relative may be disparate with respect to single items - especially those not directly observable -, subscale and total scores seem to allow predictions based on observer judgements. The assessment of stroke patients' disabilities and handicaps through relatives' judgements with the WHODAS II scales is reliable.
Similar articles
-
WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives.Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(11):855-64. doi: 10.1080/09638280802355262. Disabil Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 19093276
-
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 15029084 French.
-
The clinimetric properties of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II in early inflammatory arthritis.Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):382-90. doi: 10.1002/art.23314. Arthritis Rheum. 2008. PMID: 18311751
-
Inter-rater reliability of delirium rating scales.Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25(1):48-52. doi: 10.1159/000085440. Epub 2005 Apr 25. Neuroepidemiology. 2005. PMID: 15855805 Review.
-
[Practical and theoretical limits of score systems].Unfallchirurg. 1994 Apr;97(4):185-90. Unfallchirurg. 1994. PMID: 8197464 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Health-related quality of life using WHODAS 2.0 and associated factors 1 year after stroke in Korea: a multi-centre and cross-sectional study.BMC Neurol. 2022 Dec 24;22(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-03032-2. BMC Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36564762 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring functional disability in children with developmental disorders in low-resource settings: validation of Developmental Disorders-Children Disability Assessment Schedule (DD-CDAS) in rural Pakistan.Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020 Jul 13;7:e17. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2020.10. eCollection 2020. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2020. PMID: 32913656 Free PMC article.
-
A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Jun 5;10:301-307. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S150526. eCollection 2018. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018. PMID: 29892201 Free PMC article.
-
Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20. Bull World Health Organ. 2010. PMID: 21076562 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2" in patients with chronic diseases.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 May 19;8:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-51. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010. PMID: 20482853 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical